Search for: "Mark Fish v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 455
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
2 May 2024, 2:27 pm
Is Delaware law as stated in MacRitchie consistent with Dodge v. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 9:05 pm
In SEC v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 am
[Cite to Ohio State v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:44 pm
Here at least the labor specialization of states has produced something quite interesting. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 3:24 pm
South Dakota (D.S.D. 2011) ("subsequent decisions by the United States Supreme Court expressly cast doubt on the [ ] validity of the special public-interest doctrine" (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); Fujii v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:55 pm
In Guedes v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:48 am
Newport Fishing * IP/Internet/Antitrust Professor Amicus Brief in 1-800 Contacts v. [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
It also marked the last year of that union. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 4:10 pm
The case is Gates v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 5:01 am
From Brown v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 8:02 am
He stated that, although the EASY family of trade marks had acquired distinctiveness, the threshold for distinctiveness was set very high and the "EASY" trade mark had not acquired distinctiveness on its own. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 7:44 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
Mark A. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:30 am
A fairly remarkable example is Johnson v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 11:08 am
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 9:06 pm
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 4:44 pm
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:00 am
Industria De Alimentos Zenu S.A.S. v. [read post]
