Search for: "Mark v. Seattle Times"
Results 1 - 20
of 364
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2007, 9:19 am
This morning, the Seattle Times wrote about the Hormel v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 2:27 am
The Seattle Times yesterday reported on the July 11 oral argument in the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment in Experience Hendrix, LLC, v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 8:47 pm
Excerpt of plaintiff’s Web siteaccessible through the disputed screams.com domain name Just in time for Oct. 31, there’s a spooky domain name dispute brewing right here in Seattle. [read post]
8 May 2011, 7:24 pm
The gang from Meet the Bloggers V — in Seattle in 2009. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:29 pm
The case cite is The Skinny Dip, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 4:03 am
Plaintiffs were arrested for violating a Seattle ordinance that at the time said, [A.] [read post]
25 Jun 2007, 6:08 pm
The Seattle Times reported June 23 that the Portland, Ore. [read post]
23 Sep 2007, 9:12 pm
Seuss Enterprises, L.P. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2013, 6:21 am
Action Ink, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2017, 7:17 am
Starbucks mounted an opposition against application mark based on its marks, and variants thereof.This case is not the first time that the IPOS had to consider the similarities between two composite marks having allegedly similar layouts. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 11:27 am
However, the plaintiffs in International Franchise Association, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 1:32 pm
Seattle decides that this is a needless waste. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 9:33 pm
Now is one of those times. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 9:59 pm
But no, it’s not being fought out in Seattle. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 6:09 pm
See Wood v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:34 pm
The judges on the panel were David Steiner, Darrell Phillipson, and Mark Chow. [read post]
13 Nov 2009, 3:01 am
” One True Vine, LLC v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:30 pm
Mark Browne of Pershing Yoakley & Associates on the firm's blog, Bridging Business & Healthcare Motion to Dismiss In USGBC v. [read post]
30 Dec 2014, 7:30 am
Purchasers simply do not take the time to study the marks and see the differences. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
’” The word “focus” appears 36 times in the majority opinion and 43 times in Justice Sotomayor’s concurrence. [read post]
