Search for: "Marks v. Cross" Results 1 - 20 of 2,837
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2024, 3:41 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Accordingly, Schiavetta defendants’ cross-motion for an order dismissing the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1) and (a)(7) is GRANTED, but as the dismissal is due to deficiencies in the pleading, the dismissal will be without prejudice (see Cadet-Duval v Gursim Holding, Inc., 147 AD3d 718, 720 [2d Dept 2017]). [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:12 am by Keith Mallinson
As stated by the judges’ decisions in Unwired Planet v Huawei and TCL v Ericsson, respectively: “Based on my assessment of both experts, I am sure the disagreement represents cases in which reasonable people can differ. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 10:30 pm by Alessandro Marcia
It will thus retrace the different political, legislative, and judicial developments occurred, which have been marked as relevant for, or targeted to, LGBTIQA+ persons. [read post]
27 May 2024, 9:12 pm
  In any realistic sense, the lab tech or officer is testifying by marking down the notes. [read post]
27 May 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
In Flanders Fields is of course well known to many English speakers: In Flanders fields the poppies blow Between the crosses, row on row, That mark our place; and in the sky The larks, still bravely singing, fly Scarce heard amid the guns below…. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:20 am by Dennis Crouch
Patent No. 6,782,211 claims improved optical signaling by using cross-polarization interference cancellation (XPIC). [read post]
17 May 2024, 4:43 am by Matthias Weller
  Union Jack and European Union flag 2012 © Dave Kellam (CC BY-SA 2.0 Deed) Today marks a significant step towards the reconstruction of EU-UK Judicial Cooperation. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Defendant cross-moved for summary judgment seeking declaratory judgment in its favor on the constitutionality of Executive Law § 94. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Defendant cross-moved for summary judgment seeking declaratory judgment in its favor on the constitutionality of Executive Law § 94. [read post]