Search for: "Marks v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 21,452
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2024, 4:45 am
In United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 3:36 pm
That year, during the Trump v. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"When presented with a question of statutory interpretation, a court's primary consideration is to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the Legislature" (Matter of Walsh v New York State Comptroller, 34 NY3d 520, 524 [2019] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Digbasanis v Pelham Bay Donuts Inc., 224 AD3d 1047, 1048 [3d Dept 2024]). [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"When presented with a question of statutory interpretation, a court's primary consideration is to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the Legislature" (Matter of Walsh v New York State Comptroller, 34 NY3d 520, 524 [2019] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Digbasanis v Pelham Bay Donuts Inc., 224 AD3d 1047, 1048 [3d Dept 2024]). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 11:04 am
From Thursday's Finchem v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 8:55 am
(SFFA) v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 5:58 am
The State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 5:58 am
The State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 5:58 am
The State v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:19 am
Bacardi & Co. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:02 am
Garland v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:02 am
Garland v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:02 am
Garland v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 3:59 pm
”) In Virginia State Pharmacy Bd. v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 3:43 pm
” Vidal v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 3:35 pm
” Sotomayor pointed to the confusion lower courts have had applying the similar analysis Thomas offered in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 12:55 pm
United States and Kousisis v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:36 am
State v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:15 am
") (quoting United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:11 am
In Thomson v. [read post]