Search for: "Marks v. Superintendent"
Results 1 - 20
of 143
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Rosenbaum, Amanda Mangaser Savage, Kathryn Eidmann and Sarah Camiscoli of the bar of the State of the State of LA, California, of counsel), for appellants.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Mark S. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Rosenbaum, Amanda Mangaser Savage, Kathryn Eidmann and Sarah Camiscoli of the bar of the State of the State of LA, California, of counsel), for appellants.Letitia James, Attorney General, New York (Mark S. [read post]
The Supreme Court Cannot Ignore the National Security Implications of the So-Called ‘Jawboning’ Case
17 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Mary McCord is one of the counsel representing former superintendent of the New York Department of Financial Services Maria Vullo in National Rifle Association v. [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
This year marks our 10th annual accounting of ridiculous redactions, outrageous copying fees, and retaliatory attacks on requesters—and we have some doozies for the ages. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
I’ve marked in boldface, and labeled as [1] and [2], the two separate clauses of Section 3 that identify particular officers and other government officials. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:55 pm
In Guedes v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Ricotta & Marks, P.C., Long Island City, NY (Thomas A. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Ricotta & Marks, P.C., Long Island City, NY (Thomas A. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 11:46 pm
As for divorce – Jesus (in what is sometimes referred to as the Matthaean exception which is to be compared with his statements about divorce in Mark and Luke which allowed no exception) said that Moses suffered divorce, i.e. allowed it, as a present custom which he regulated – allowing it for uncleanness/unfaithfulness. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 3:45 am
John v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 8:55 am
., Davison v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:20 am
“The fact that the plaintiff subsequently was unhappy with the settlement [she] obtained . . . does not rise to the level of legal malpractice” (Katsoris v Bodnar & Milone, LLP, 186 AD3d at 1506 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Schiller v Bender, Burrows & Rosenthal, LLP, 116 AD3d 756, 758; Holschauer v Fisher, 5 AD3d 553, 554). [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 3:32 am
Last Thursday, March 2nd, the Supreme Court of India (SCI) pronounced its judgment in the case of Anoop Baranwal v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 6:20 am
This is the rare hostile environment case does not involve explicitly-racial comments directed toward the plaintiff; rather it involves personnel actions and statements made at Housing Authority meetings.The case is Williams v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 5:48 am
"] From yesterday's Wisconsin Court of Appeals decision in Gierl v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 10:18 am
" Trump v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:03 am
-W. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 10:02 am
”” In Lindke v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 4:14 pm
" Packingham v. [read post]
