Search for: "Marras v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 45
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2023, 6:37 am
 Cuba represents a most interesting variant of Marxist-Leninist state organization. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 4:44 pm by CAFE
Code § 371: Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States 18 U.S. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:38 pm
The requirement of authentication is thus a condition precedent to admitting evidence” (United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2016, 3:19 am
  It is meant to suggest the state of the global human rights project, its challenges and trajectories, and to itemize activities in states that suggest reason for "optimism" or "concern. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 5:17 am by David Markus
That standard worked for a while, but with the development of new technology, it has become very difficultThe first case was “United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 7:15 am by David Markus
Judge Tjoflat, joined by Judge Ed Carnes and Judge Marra, has this new opinion in United States v. [read post]