Search for: "Martin v. Department of Corrections"
Results 1 - 20
of 275
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2024, 1:56 am
As mentioned above, on Thursday 20 June 2024 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed, Sales, Hamblen, Burrows and Richards) handed down a unanimous judgment in the case of Mueen-Uddin v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Styen J handed down judgement in the case of Prospect v Evans [2024] EWHC 1533 (KB). [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Moulton Martin Shulman LlinÉt M. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Moulton Martin Shulman LlinÉt M. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am
Martin Kratz, R. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
To give the reader some idea of the artificial flavor of Egilman’s pomposity, paragraph 8 of his remarkable declaration avers” “My views on the scientific standards for the determination of cause-effect relationships (medical epistemology) have been cited by the Massachusetts Supreme Court (Vassallo v. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:00 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit ruled in Martin v. [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
" That's correct: Shugerman and Rao had no documentary evidence in 2017, and Shugerman has no documentary evidence now. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 12:34 pm
The court also denied review in a case in which the Missouri Department of Corrections claimed it had been deprived of a fair trial in an employment discrimination case because the judge struck potential jurors who had religious objections to homosexuality. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
Justice Department (DOJ) jointly issued merger guidelines, supplanting 2023’s draft guidelines, the 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines, and the 2020 (partially withdrawn) Vertical Merger Guidelines. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
IPSO 18075-23 Singh v The Sunday Times, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 18301-23 Taylor v The Herald on Sunday, 1 Accuracy 2021, Breach – sanction: publication of correction 19677-23 A complainant v The Daily Telegraph, 3 Harassment (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 19741-23 Dikme v eveningnews24.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction:… [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
”As a result, the Court of Appeal had to re-assess the originality of the GUIs at issue by applying the correct test. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 7:30 am
In addition, intelligence and law enforcement agencies have increasingly used specious legal reasoning and deep pockets to buy their way around Carpenter v. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
On 4 August 2023, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in National Council for Civil Liberties, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Anor [2023] EWCA Civ 926. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 1:24 am
The section Facts and corrections, including information on “Was Ben Field a ‘trainee vicar’? [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 2:57 am
In Baker v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:21 pm
The Department of Redundancy Department now seeks review. [read post]
31 May 2023, 2:01 pm
Previously arcane arguments over the constitutionality of the public debt limit now make headlines.[1] At the same time, debate swirls around whether the President of the United States has the constitutional authority, resting on Section Four of the 14thamendment, to ignore the debt limit. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
These allegations are consistent with the Department of Justice’s court filings in Cohen’s federal criminal case. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 11:37 am
Martin Fackler, military trauma surgeon, former director of the Army's Wound Ballistics Laboratory, an [read post]
