Search for: "Martin v. Public Safety " Results 1 - 20 of 346
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2024, 11:28 am by Ilya Somin
Barring some kind of significant danger to public health or safety (of which there is no evidence here), Quintana should not have had to get special permission to use his property for commercial purposes in the first place. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
After all, by 1999, The Institute of Medicine (now the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine) delivered its assessment of the safety of silicone breast implants. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 11:00 am by Amy Howe
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit ruled in Martin v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:52 am by INFORRM
The title is one of a number of publications and individuals to receive a letter from Wootton’s lawyers after reporting that he was the subject of a police investigation. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:00 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
“We will not waiver from our commitment to protect public safety for all. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Ofcom has issued a reminder regarding its stakeholder consultation on the code of practice under the Online Safety Act. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
The body of Congress is ineffectual to carry the great objects of safety and protection into execution. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
(Rowe, Martin and Moreau JJ. concurring): “This is an appeal from R. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Her dissertation title is, however, as Martin Short would say, a bit of a tell. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am by INFORRM
The defendant argued that the broadcast was subject to reporting privilege under the Defamation Act 1996 and that the publication was on a matter of public interest. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Christopher Kurka allowed Pat Martin, head of Alaska Right to Life, to use their offices for several hours when Martin traveled from Wasilla to the state Capitol “with the stated intent to distribute signed petitions to the Legislature. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 3:40 am by INFORRM
Pennsylvania State Police heavily redacted the policy, citing public safety concerns. [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
The new policy claims the collection of biometric information is “for safety, security, and identification purposes. [read post]