Search for: "Martin v. Stevens"
Results 1 - 20
of 467
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2024, 8:59 am
King v. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
Winter was coming, as it does. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 1:27 am
Chair of Law Martin Luther King Jr. [read post]
25 Dec 2023, 12:03 pm
V. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Her dissertation title is, however, as Martin Short would say, a bit of a tell. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Martin. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 11:28 am
In Rost v. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 2:35 am
In AWF v Goldsmith, the US Supreme Court clarified that not all works which add “new expression, meaning, or message”[15] will be considered ‘transformative’ by the law, since this would conflict with the copyright holder’s “exclusive right to prepare derivative works,” effectively rendering it useless. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 2:25 pm
No doubt they mean well and aren’t beholden to Access Copyright – but their opinions are so over the top and poorly informed that they have a very bad look:Kate Taylor, May 26, 2023 Hugh Stevens, July 15, 2023 Hugh Steven’s opinion piece conveniently follows up just two days later on the announcement by Access Copyright (“AC”) that it was downsizing and restructuring. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Ingerman Smith, LLP, Hauppauge, NY (Steven A. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
Ingerman Smith, LLP, Hauppauge, NY (Steven A. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:54 pm
It would be useful to borrow from Steven Chong, J’s reading of the doctrine in BCY v BCZ, which is also a case of the Singapore High Court that applied the composite approach of Sulamerica. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 9:29 am
See, e.g., Smith v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 2:42 pm
City of Philadelphia (Injury in fact standing doctrine) Martin v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
Father Steven Girard 50. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 10:36 am
Schultz, Steven Tepp. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Rev., Forthcoming).From SSRN (Abortion and Reproductive Rights):Martin E. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 10:35 am
The case, Chason v. [read post]
15 Feb 2023, 6:47 am
Martin v Claude Castro & Assoc. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
Putting aside the idiosyncratic chapter by the late Professor Berger, most of the third edition of the Reference Manual presented guidance on many important issues. [read post]
