Search for: "Martin v. Superintendent" Results 1 - 20 of 61
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Upon receipt, the superintendent convenes a review committee, which then has 60 days to review the challenged materials and submit a report to the superintendent. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Upon receipt, the superintendent convenes a review committee, which then has 60 days to review the challenged materials and submit a report to the superintendent. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"At the expiration of the probationary term, the superintendent of schools shall make a written report to the board of education recommending for appointment on tenure those persons who have been found competent, efficient and satisfactory" (Matter of Brown v Board of Educ. of Mahopac Cent. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"At the expiration of the probationary term, the superintendent of schools shall make a written report to the board of education recommending for appointment on tenure those persons who have been found competent, efficient and satisfactory" (Matter of Brown v Board of Educ. of Mahopac Cent. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, "the fundamental duty" of defendant's office is "to 'superintend the fiscal concerns of the state'" (Matter of Martin H. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, "the fundamental duty" of defendant's office is "to 'superintend the fiscal concerns of the state'" (Matter of Martin H. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, "the fundamental duty" of defendant's office is "to 'superintend the fiscal concerns of the state'" (Matter of Martin H. [read post]
11 May 2022, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
However, "the fundamental duty" of defendant's office is "to 'superintend the fiscal concerns of the state'" (Matter of Martin H. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
Al.com had a piece “Alabama settles former Jeffco superintendent’s defamation lawsuit for $100,000. [read post]
27 Sep 2020, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
The second case, , Martin v McGuinness, she said merely reflected on a general right of privacy in obiter, simply as a response to submissions that were made on the point. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Campaigns Say They’ll Match Political Contributions. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Stephen Budiansky concerning Budiansky’s book “Oliver Wendell Holmes: A Life in War, Law, and Ideas” (W.W. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 7:24 am by Michael Crowell
The Supreme Court dodged the constitutional issue in Brannon v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 6:14 am
(3) On April 17, 2013, Bishop turned the suitcase over to David Smith, the Superintendent of Evergreen Cemetery. [read post]