Search for: "Martinez v. County of Los Angeles" Results 1 - 20 of 49
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Right-Wing Think Tank Claimed to Be a Church. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Tucker Carlson Just Inadvertently Helped Raise $14,000 for Abortion Rights MSN – Steven Zeitchik (Washington Post) | Published: 6/27/2022 Hours after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
Following his acquittal, Tekoh sued Vega, Vega’s supervisor, the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department, and the County of Los Angeles for damages. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 12:51 pm by Rohini Kurup
” The claim included 11 charges against the United States, the FBI, former FBI Director Robert Mueller and former FBI Los Angeles Field Office Assistant Director Steven Martinez in their official capacities, and five FBI agents in their individual capacities. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 11:26 am by Nassiri Law
Contact the employment attorneys at Nassiri Law Group, practicing in Orange County, Riverside and Los Angeles. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:34 pm by Richard Hunt
City of Los Angeles,  2019 WL 3213581 (C.D. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 8:35 am by Jon Sands
The panel remanded these claims to the district court for further proceedings, including whether to excuse the procedural default under Martinez v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 2:24 pm
She is currently a Law Clerk at Venable LLP in Los Angeles. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 5:00 am by Cyrus Farivar
Snapchat, was originally filed in May 2016 in a Los Angeles County court but was transferred to federal court on Thursday at Snapchat’s behest. [read post]
18 Oct 2014, 6:40 pm by Joy Waltemath
The appeals court agreed that the drivers could rely on the Industrial Welfare Commission definition of an employment relationship for purposes of those claims falling within the scope of Wage Order No. 9; however, with respect to claims outside Wage Order No. 9, the common law definition will control (Dynamex Operations West, Inc v Superior Court of Los Angeles County, October 15, 2014, Perluss, D). [read post]