Search for: "Martinez v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 148
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2023, 11:55 am
After an Alameda County Superior Court ruling [read post]
Examinations Under Oath – Insurer Requests Have to Be Reasonable and Made Before the Claim Is Denied
24 Aug 2023, 5:54 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 1:25 am
Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am
NAACP v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 8:53 am
Superior Ct. [read post]
3 May 2023, 6:00 am
See Schnabel v. [read post]
17 Mar 2023, 8:50 am
Martinez was part of the legal team that represented the petitioner in the landmark case Griggs v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 1:02 pm
For example, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in Martinez v. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 1:34 pm
Superior Court (2008) 43 Cal.4th 706, 711.) [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 7:45 am
Superior Ct. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 7:45 am
Superior Ct. [read post]
27 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
In Shelby County v. [read post]
16 Aug 2021, 11:57 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit that gave one death row inmate a new hearing and required a new trial for another, the justices will weigh in on the impact of their 2012 decision in Martinez v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 6:01 am
On July 2, 2021, the US Supreme Court granted certiorari in Pivotal Software, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2019, 11:43 am
These three criteria were formally recognized in a 2010 California Supreme Court case entitled, Martinez v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 10:10 am
In examining the question of joint employment status, the Ninth Circuit considered the three definitions for employment that the California Supreme Court applied to joint employment claims in Martinez v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 4:30 am
The prior employment test came from a case called Martinez v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 6:51 am
The district court recognized that “no binding decision ha[d] addressed the standard applicable to determining whether a franchisor is an employer of a franchisee,” and “in the absence of controlling authority” it applied the standard from Martinez v Combs, with the gloss of Patterson v Domino’s Pizza, LLC . [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 11:35 am
According to the initial complaint, Martinez et al v. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 3:19 pm
Turning from the common law “control” test, the appellate court then considered the California Supreme Court’s discussion of “employ” as set forth in Martinez v. [read post]
