Search for: "Mason v. State of Conn." Results 1 - 20 of 28
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2023, 8:51 am by jonathanturley
  Indeed, last year, two children were given THC-infused gummies while trick-or-treating, according to police in Waterford, Conn.. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am by jonathanturley
  Indeed, last year, two children were given THC-infused gummies while trick-or-treating, according to police in Waterford, Conn.. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am by Eugene Volokh
I'll begin by laying out a few categories of situations where the risk of reputational harm is especially serious, and then summarize the state of court decisions on the subject. [1.] [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky In re Mason, 514 B.R. 852, 859. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am by Kyle Persaud
Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky In re Mason, 514 B.R. 852, 859. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 11:08 am by Gordon Ahl
-Conn.) discussing solutions to the cybercrime threat. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 11:49 am by Jack Sharman
  As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit said in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:30 pm by James Kim
Justice Gorsuch, has described that method, articulated in the Court’s 1984 decision in Chevron v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
  By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 8:55 am
Mason Contractors, Inc., 307 Conn. 412, 420– 21, 54 A.3d 1005 (2012) (underlying action). [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]