Search for: "Matter of C. F. v C. M." Results 1 - 20 of 1,368
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Cuomo v New York State Commn. on Ethics & Lobbying in Govt.2024 NY Slip Op 02568Decided on May 9, 2024Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPowers, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered:May 9, 2024CV-23-1778[*1]Andrew M. [read post]
15 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Cuomo v New York State Commn. on Ethics & Lobbying in Govt.2024 NY Slip Op 02568Decided on May 9, 2024Appellate Division, Third DepartmentPowers, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered:May 9, 2024CV-23-1778[*1]Andrew M. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
”[3] Critical Infrastructure Sector:  As a threshold matter, an entity is only a Covered Entity if it belongs to one of 16 industries that qualify as critical infrastructure sectors under the Act. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am by admin
The defense had identified another two studies that were germane.[15] Chief Judge Rosenstengel’s opinion is noteworthy for its fine attention to detail, detail that matters to the validity of the expert witness’s enterprise. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Bernard Bell
Trump, 928 F. 3d 226 (2d Cir. 2019), vacated as moot sub nom, Biden v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 10:32 am
Tal como nas fórmulas do patético de Aby Warburg, não se distingue nelas criação e performance, original e cópia. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
As a practical matter, the burden shifts to the party that wishes to challenge the relied upon facts and data to learn more about the cited studies to show that the facts and data are not sufficient under Rule 702(b), and that the testimony is not the product of reliable methods under Rule 702(c). [read post]