Search for: "Matter of Anthony N. v State of New York" Results 1 - 20 of 67
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
Irving Selecoff arrives in Liverpool, from New York, aboard the S.S. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am by David Kopel
Rules from Bruen Further analysis of the material in this Part is in my article Restoring the right to bear arms: New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The ‘Cost’ of Voting in America: A look at where it’s easiest and hardest Seattle Times – Nick Corasaniti and Allison McCann (New York Times) | Published: 9/21/2022 A new study ranks all 50 states based on the overall investment a resident must make, in time and resources, to vote. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
On the third day of the uprising, King gave an impromptu news conference, deploring the shooting of a security guard that had taken place and pleading for an end to the violence. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 1:51 pm by Eugene Volokh
" Accordingly, "[A]n award in a defamation case of nominal compensatory damages and substantial punitive damages is within the court's province under the applicable New York law. [read post]
4 Jun 2022, 5:25 pm by Chuck Cosson
  This means a perfect state of security would lead to worse security than would a state where cybersecurity periodically fails. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am by Steve Gottlieb
Sonia Nazario wrote “Someone Is Always Trying to Kill You,” the cover story of the New York Times Sunday Review a year ago. [read post]
31 Mar 2020, 2:30 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Brandes, titled" Stare Decisis, Precedent and Dicta, appears in the March 2020 issue of the New York State Bar Journal, Vol.92, No. 2 at page 36. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 6:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
The First Department declined to follow the interpretation of the Second Department which held that the ICPC applies to a nonrespondent parent living outside of New York (Matter of Alexus M. v. [read post]