Search for: "Matter of Application of Farley"
Results 1 - 20
of 73
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2024, 2:40 am
On the same day, there was a case management conference in the case of Farley and others v Paymaster (1836) Ltd t/a Equiniti QB-2021-001497. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:06 am
As a result, Grant was at risk of having to pay £10 million in legal costs if the matter proceeded to trial and reluctantly accepted the offer. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 4:59 pm
Shoveling sand against the tide, b/c we have ¾ million-1 million new applications/year. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
In Two Pesos, the Supreme Court tells us that “the general principles qualifying a mark for registration under § 2 of the Lanham Act are for the most part applicable in determining whether an unregistered mark is entitled to protection under § 43(a). [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 10:23 am
In Cariou, the ordered destruction of the Prince works clearly mattered to the Second Circuit’s reversal. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 4:54 pm
Authenticity seems to matter to people even when there’s nothing tangible, like NFTs. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
Of course, the Lanham Act provisions in Section 2(a) banning registration of disparaging, immoral, and scandalous matter also did not restrict the speech of Simon Tam and Erik Brunetti. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 5:01 am
The amended hunter harassment law does not target all First Amendment activities that concern hunting as a subject matter. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
By Guest Bloggers Margaret Chon and Christine Haight Farley [Margaret Chon is a Professor of Law at Seattle University School of Law, and Christine Haight Farley is a Professor of Law at American University Washington College of Law.] [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 11:00 am
[T]he one showed in the application is not mine. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
(See the briefs and amicus briefs filed in the Jack Daniel’s case, and Part I of my paper with Professor Farley.) [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 7:23 am
Christine Farley, Authenticity and Design: Why sell a chair for 10x a visually identical chair? [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 11:23 am
Professor Faigman further concludes, “[t]he prejudicial nature of this error was compounded by the fact that the substance of the scientific testimony in question was false as a matter of neuroscientific consensus. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am
[The exam in my American legal history course consists of two essays, one on the legal history of some regulatory regime my students did not study but which developed much like those they did. [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am
”[6] Although any actual apportionment, upon which reasonable people can disagree, must be made by the trier of fact, whether the plaintiff’s harm is apportionable is a question for the court.[7] Judicial Applications of Apportionment Principles Some of the earliest cases apportioning property damages involved the worrying and killing of sheep by dogs belonging to two or more persons. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:32 pm
However, capacity doctrines are discriminatory in application. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 2:00 am
As protests erupted over decades of racial injustice sparked by George Floyd’s death at the hands of Minneapolis police, companies rushed to publish statements in support of Black Lives Matter. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 2:00 am
As protests erupted over decades of racial injustice sparked by George Floyd’s death at the hands of Minneapolis police, companies rushed to publish statements in support of Black Lives Matter. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 10:31 am
[As Christine Farley pointed out in comments, that was against a different background legal regime. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:57 am
Section 1052 does not clearly require rejecting an application or treating as unprotected a mark that was once generic for the goods in question. [read post]
