Search for: "Matter of Askin" Results 1 - 20 of 31
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2023, 10:36 am by Dennis Crouch
Conversely, it would be improper for a district court to permit a matter to proceed to trial on the basis of vague and unidentified theories. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioner failed to show by competent proof that ACS terminated his employment in bad faith, or for an improper or impermissible reason (see Matter of Che Lin Tsao v Kelly, 28 AD3d 320, 321 [1st Dept 2006]; see also Matter of Patterson v City of New York, 173 AD3d 540, 541 [1st Dept 2019], lv denied 35 NY3d 906 [2020]). [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Petitioner failed to show by competent proof that ACS terminated his employment in bad faith, or for an improper or impermissible reason (see Matter of Che Lin Tsao v Kelly, 28 AD3d 320, 321 [1st Dept 2006]; see also Matter of Patterson v City of New York, 173 AD3d 540, 541 [1st Dept 2019], lv denied 35 NY3d 906 [2020]). [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 11:10 am by Dennis N. Brager
Askins & Miller Orthopedics, involved a private medical practice which refused to pay payroll taxes. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 3:19 pm by Matthew David Brozik
The defendants are some twenty entities (plus Does and ABC Companies), all of whom/which are or were in some way or another involved in the production of a play called “Hand to God,” which was written by defendant Robert Askins. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 3:01 am
Steinberg, Introduction: Proving Mass Rape Kelly Dawn Askin, Can the ICC Sustain a Conviction for the Underlying Crime of Mass Rape without Testimony from Victims? [read post]
A recent column by law professor and ACLU general counsel Frank Askin provides a further reminder of the intractability of national security bureaucracies. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:19 am by emagraken
Askin being self represented, the Government does not appear to be treating this matter lightly, bringing some leading constitutional litigators to defend their position. [read post]