Search for: "Matter of Bellinger"
Results 1 - 20
of 140
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2023, 12:15 am
Historic England (HE): did not object, subject to certain matters being given more detailed consideration; 19.3. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 7:59 am
” I don’t know how this approach resonated with the judge, but to me it felt like a nihilistic argument akin to saying: “Nothing we do matters. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 11:46 pm
The matter was ‘resolved’ by the Marriage Act 1836 which introduced what we now call “civil weddings”. [read post]
30 May 2023, 9:01 pm
On April 19, 2023, the Supreme Court removed two key potential obstacles to the criminal prosecution of foreign states and their agencies and instrumentalities in U.S. courts. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 5:51 am
Note: The author would like to acknowledge that this article benefited from a Workshop, held on Feb. 3 at the George Washington University Law School, entitled “U.S. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 2:33 am
Whether or not the bells are to be removed is a matter entirely for negotiation between the Diocese, the Church Commissioners, and the Regeneration Trust. will not take effect unless and until local authority listed building consent has been obtained for the bells’ removal [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 6:05 am
Other countries are, of course, free to grant more immunity to U.S. government contractors than customary international law requires as a matter of international comity. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 10:06 am
State Department Legal Adviser John Bellinger as an expert witness) to pull out all the legal stops possible. [read post]
14 Jul 2021, 7:51 am
Indeed, the Vietnam War would continue with substantial U.S. involvement for more than two years after the repeal, and the legal revocation of the 1964 resolution thus seemed to matter little. [read post]
22 Mar 2021, 8:01 am
The committee will hear testimony from Rebecca Ingber, a professor at Cardozo Law School and senior fellow at the Reiss Center on Law and Security at NYU Law School; Tess Bridgeman, the co-editor-in-chief of Just Security and a senior fellow at the Reiss Center; and John Bellinger III, the former legal adviser to the State Department and the National Security Council. [read post]
1 Oct 2020, 6:03 am
This distinction may not matter for Title III itself, which defines “trafficking” to cover both direct and indirect interactions with confiscated property, but it arguably could make the difference between a constitutional injury i [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:55 pm
Here’s what will work,” John Bellinger, Washington Post op-ed, 4/23/20 “Congress hands Obama first veto override,” Politico, 9/28/16 MCCONNELL STATE BANKRUPTCY COMMENTS Clip: Mitch McConnell expresses support for allowing states to go bankrupt, Hugh Hewitt radio show, 4/22/20 “McConnell takes flak after suggesting bankruptcy for states rather than bailouts,” Washington Post, 4/23/20 SUPREME COURT Ramos v. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:05 pm
At one level, of course, this is not surprising—John Bellinger identified Donald Trump as a potential danger to U.S. national security in 2015, and Benjamin Wittes followed up in 2016 and 2017. [read post]
22 Dec 2018, 6:17 am
Circuit Court of Appeals issued a ruling in a sealed case related to a grand jury matter believed to be linked to the special counsel investigation. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 2:56 pm
The group of high-level Department of Justice officials includes two former acting attorneys general (Peter Keisler and Stuart Gerson), a former director of both the Central Intelligence Agency and Federal Bureau of Investigation (William Webster) and a former State Department legal adviser (John Bellinger). [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 11:05 am
John Bellinger memorialized the late president George H.W. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 1:24 pm
Indeed, there are signs that the United States would be likely to prevail on the merits in both matters, a prospect that neither withdrawal is likely to improve upon. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 11:42 am
” The validity of the ICC’s jurisdictional regime as a matter of international law has been debated at length. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 11:01 am
And the pendency of the Afghanistan investigation all but ensured some friction between Washington and The Hague, no matter who was in the White House. [read post]
6 Jul 2018, 5:18 am
I am tentatively of the view that none of the justices handled the matter optimally. [read post]
