Search for: "Matter of Cert. of a Question of Law"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,619
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jun 2024, 4:30 am
If the court does not act on the petition within that window, the petition would be denied as a matter of law. [read post]
27 May 2024, 4:00 am
Question 3 (40 percent)You’re still in the version of reality described by Question 2. [read post]
22 May 2024, 9:01 pm
’s Data Scraping Claims Are Preempted by Copyright Law Section 301 of the Copyright Act preempts state law claims that enforce rights that are “equivalent to any of the exclusive rights within the general scope of copyright” and that “come within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
21 May 2024, 8:36 pm
But the matter continues in the lower courts. [read post]
15 May 2024, 7:41 am
But if the three dissenters can persuade two of their colleagues that the discovery rule is incompatible with section 507(b), then damages for all copyright infringement actions would be limited to three years before the date the action is filed, and last week’s decision will be “a dead letter” as far as copyright law is concerned (although it would remain potentially important in other areas of law where the discovery rule is used). [read post]
10 May 2024, 12:30 pm
New cert petition! [read post]
9 May 2024, 10:07 pm
See Pet. for Cert. 14, n. [read post]
8 May 2024, 5:51 pm
” That’s a really interesting question. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 11:05 am
If administration change: FTC declines to seek cert. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:08 am
Wullschleger, 23-677Issues: (1) Whether a post-removal amendment of a complaint to omit federal questions defeats federal-question subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am
Under federal law, paraquat can be used to control the growth of weeds only “by or under the direct supervision of a certified applicator. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 10:56 am
Fowler: The short answer is it’s the best thing ever invented for law school. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 12:30 pm
Normally, police violate the Fourth Amendment if they extend a traffic stop to ask questions unrelated to handling the matter. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 2:44 pm
Questions of law are always reviewed de novo. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:55 am
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court devotes growing attention to a slice of highly salient public law questions, including those presented on the shadow docket, thereby slighting matters of private law and fueling dysfunctional decision-making. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
One Tenth Circuit judge has already held that Fourth Corner Credit Union (Fourth Corner), which was legally eligible for a master account and proposed to provide payment services to marijuana businesses, was entitled to a master account as a matter of law. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
Dwyer, a young, earnest immunologist who had done some contract work on an unrelated matter for Bristol-Myers Squibb, a defendant in the litigation. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 8:44 am
Wullschleger 23-677Issues: (1) Whether a post-removal amendment of a complaint to omit federal questions defeats federal-question subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. [read post]
