Search for: "Matter of Davis-Taylor v Davis-Taylor" Results 1 - 20 of 93
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
The complaints relate to: Two editions of Friday Morning with Esther and Phil (presented by husband and wife Conservative MPs Esther McVey and Philip Davies); “State of the Nation”, a programme presented by another Tory MP, Jacob Rees-Mogg; and an episode of the Laurence Fox show which was guest presented by Martin Daubney. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 1:29 am by CMS
Of most significance to these appeals is the Court of Appeal decision in Taylor v A Novo (UK) Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 194) (‘Novo’) Taylor v A Novo (UK) Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 194 (18 March 2013) (bailii.org). [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
We note below where further information would be helpful before reaching any firm conclusion on a matter. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  If this seems too bleak a view of the Court, consider that this is exactly what the Court did in Vega v. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
In July 2022, the Arizona Republic reported on the mysterious source of more than $2 million that had been spent on television ads to help Lake win her Republican primary contest against wealthy developer Karrin Taylor Robson. [read post]
24 Dec 2022, 6:50 pm by Bill Marler
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Federal Campaign Spending on Childcare Expenses Grows in 2022 Midterms OpenSecrets – Taylor Giorno | Published: 8/17/2022 Federal candidates are on track to spend more money on childcare ahead of 2022 midterms than in either of the previous two election cycles. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 10:32 am by Roger Parloff
Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, who fended off her own Section 3 challenge, won her primary with nearly 70 percent of the vote. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A 49-Year Crusade: Inside the movement to overturn Roe v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:22 am by Oscar Davies and Jack Castle
Oscar Davies, a barrister at Lamb Chambers, and Jack Castle, a barrister at Henderson Chambers, offer their views on the Elan-Cane decision (R (On the application of Elan-Cane) v Secretary of State for the Home Department) [2021] UKSC 56) in this piece that first appeared in the New Law Journal. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 7:30 am by Gene Takagi
Supreme Court has misleading opponents and potentially huge impact – we weigh in on the side of transparency & prosecution of bad actors: CalNonprofitsGene: Americans for Prosperity v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 6:56 pm by Gene Takagi
First, we heard closing args in the Fairbairn v. [read post]