Search for: "Matter of Dept. of Insurance's Order"
Results 1 - 20
of 433
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
ORDERED that the decision is affirmed, without costs. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 5:47 am
These videos did not appear to the trial judge to contain any evidence that would change any of the medical experts’ conclusions drawn from the remainder of the evidence, but because a judge may not substitute his or her lay opinion for matters requiring expert testimony, the videos were shown to all of the medical evaluators to obtain their perspective. [read post]
9 May 2024, 2:00 pm
One check went out, but they spoke before the second one was sent, and insurance covered most of the first check. [read post]
8 May 2024, 4:51 am
Corp. v Insurance Co. of N. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:21 am
Questions for Another Day 1650 Broadway is bad news for outside accountants and their liability insurance companies, and good news for allegedly defrauded close business owners looking for a potential deep pocket, for whom insurance is almost never available in business divorce litigation. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
LEXIS 450 (3d Dept. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 4:51 am
In the end, bifurcation is “not an absolute given,” but a matter of discretion: it is the “responsibility of the trial judge to exercise discretion in determining whether bifurcation is appropriate in light of all relevant facts and circumstances presented by the individual case” (Rueda v Elmhurst Woodside, LLC, 187 AD3d 955 [2d Dept 2020]). [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 10:01 am
Only the Commission was empowered to order the implementation of the enforcement mechanisms in Idaho Code § 72-434. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
ORDERED that the decisions are affirmed, without costs. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 6:00 am
ORDERED that the decisions are affirmed, without costs. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Entitlement to a hearing on a modification petition, however, is not automatic; the petitioning parent must make a threshold evidentiary showing of a change in circumstances demonstrating a need for modification in order to insure the child’s best interests. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 7:26 am
One check went out, but they spoke before the second one was sent, and insurance covered most of the first check. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 4:09 am
State Farm Insurance v. [read post]
6 Aug 2023, 5:40 am
Slip Op. 03971(1st Dept, 2023) the Appellate Division observed New York’s Age 29 Law, which was effective approximately one year before the Affordable Care Act, amended various sections of the State’s Insurance Law to “expand[ ] access to health insurance by allowing unmarried children through age 29, regardless of financial dependence, to be covered under a parent’s group health insurance policy. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 10:39 am
The order of the trial court was affirmed on appeal. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 11:19 am
Fort Pierce Police Dept., 186 So. 3d 581 (Fla. 1st DCA 2016), bears some resemblance to our case. [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 4:43 am
Montelione seems to be a case where the attorneys do not have insurance coverage nor insurance defense, and appeal to be pro-se. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 4:37 am
State Compensation Insurance Fund v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 10:41 pm
Dept. of Industrial Relations (1989) 48 Cal. 3d 341, 769 P.2d 399, 256 Cal. [read post]
