Search for: "Matter of Grand Jury Proceeding (Doe)" Results 1 - 20 of 852
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2024, 5:58 am by Benson Varghese
Prosecutors have all the powers inherent to the state—endless budgets for investigation combining local law enforcement with the investigative powers of the grand jury and prosecutors’ own investigators. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 5:58 am by Benson Varghese
Prosecutors have all the powers inherent to the state—endless budgets for investigation combining local law enforcement with the investigative powers of the grand jury and prosecutors’ own investigators. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 5:58 am by Benson Varghese
Prosecutors have all the powers inherent to the state—endless budgets for investigation combining local law enforcement with the investigative powers of the grand jury and prosecutors’ own investigators. [read post]
27 May 2024, 2:27 pm by Michael Lowe
A great many federal criminal proceedings do involve appointed counsel, such as the attorneys employed as federal public defenders (FPDs) at the Federal Public Defender’s office for the Northern District of Texas. [read post]
20 May 2024, 12:34 pm by Michael Lowe
  It’s a big hint that there is an ongoing grand jury investigation into matters involving the individual’s life or pursuits in some way. [read post]
14 May 2024, 10:15 pm by Ryan Goodman
A part of former President Donald Trump’s effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election involved an effort to misuse the Electoral College in seven battleground states. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 2:18 pm by Scott Bomboy
The reply also continues the argument that Trump cannot be tried for the alleged Jan. 6 acts since the matter was considered during his Senate impeachment proceedings. [read post]
21 Apr 2024, 2:25 pm by Steven Calabresi
It says that: "The Attorney General or any other officer of the Department of Justice, or any attorney specially appointed by the Attorney General under law, may, when specifically directed by the Attorney General, conduct any kind of legal proceeding, civil or criminal, including grand jury proceedings and proceedings before committing magistrate judges, which United States Attorneys are authorized by law to conduct, whether or not he is a resident… [read post]
30 Mar 2024, 7:05 pm by Steven Calabresi
Former President Bill Clinton's perjury under oath before a federal grand jury led to his acquittal by the Senate in his impeachment trial, and, after Clinton left office, the only penalty he paid for his lies under oath about sex to a federal grand jury was disbarment and the entry of a plea bargain. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 11:39 am by Steven Schwartzapfel
Criminal Cases And Grand Juries The Fifth Amendment specifically comes into play in criminal law. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 4:07 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
It does not mean a fanciful or capricious doubt, nor does it mean beyond all possibility of doubt. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 5:53 am by Daniel Spiegel
When the State enters a VDGJ, there is necessarily a gap in the proceedings that does not occur when the matter is “bound over” to superior court after a finding of probable cause or waiver of the hearing. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:22 am by centerforartlaw
Rybolovlev admitted that it’s hard for him to trust people, but once he does, he trusts them entirely. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 5:57 am by Norman L. Eisen
Trump also argues the grand jury was not provided with adequate evidence of any intent to defraud. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm by Marty Lederman
”  After all, the Department of Justice and the grand jury have charged hundreds of individuals in connection with the January 6 attack on the Capitol—some even with “seditious conspiracy” under 18 U.S.C. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 1:39 pm by Matthew Ackerman
  The taking is part of a grand public project that dramatically increases the remainder’s value. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 7:00 am by Norman L. Eisen
Expand all Collapse all Relevant State Court Proceedings State of New York v. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 7:10 am by Marty Lederman
 Third, some Justices might be uneasy about the propriety of the Supreme Court declaring a major party’s presidential candidate to be ineligible to serve where so many other actors in the constitutional system either have declined already to take steps sufficient to prevent him from taking office (including 43 Senators during the second impeachment proceedings, as well as the Department of Justice and the grand jury that have declined to invoke the insurrection… [read post]