Search for: "Matter of Green v Bell" Results 1 - 20 of 106
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Others have gone down this dubious path before, but these authors’ embrace of the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ opinion in Bendectin litigation reveals the insubstantiality and the invalidity of their method.[18] As Professor Ronald Allen put the matter: “Given the weight of evidence in favor of Bendectin’s safety, it seems peculiar to argue for mosaic evidence [WOE] from a case in which it would have plainly been misleading. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 9:35 am by John-Paul Boyd KC
You can have a process that gives you all the bells and whistles of a trial, but do you need all those bells and all those whistles? [read post]
1 May 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
The matter must either relate to serious misconduct, or it must otherwise be important for safeguarding the public welfare in matters of health and safety (or of comparable public importance) that the information should be known to whom it is disclosed. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 9:15 am by Eric Goldman
Smith-Green * Mortuary Sciences College Student Disciplined for Threatening Facebook Posts–Tatro v. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 11:20 am by Aaron Moss
But rather than compare the two works as a whole to determine whether substantial similarity was plausible (as required by the Supreme Court per Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 5:06 pm by Adam Levitin
" It's impossible (I think) to square this with the Supreme Court's recent ruling in Czyzewski v. [read post]