Search for: "Matter of Jacobs v Allen"
Results 1 - 20
of 41
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2024, 8:47 am
Wright Allen (E.D. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
As with the Fresh Market matter, comp [read post]
3 Sep 2023, 4:43 pm
The complaints relate to: Two editions of Friday Morning with Esther and Phil (presented by husband and wife Conservative MPs Esther McVey and Philip Davies); “State of the Nation”, a programme presented by another Tory MP, Jacob Rees-Mogg; and an episode of the Laurence Fox show which was guest presented by Martin Daubney. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
It has provided virtually no guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on what it means for a matter to present a “major question,” it has provided little guidance on the degree of statutory specificity necessary to provide agency authority over a major question . . . . [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am
We note below where further information would be helpful before reaching any firm conclusion on a matter. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
On the same day, there were hearings on applications for injunctions in the cases of Payone v Logo and Searl v Dimova-Handley. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 3:45 am
Google and Twitter v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am
(“No serious congressional scholar believes that Congress speaks clearly when addressing major questions as a descriptive matter. [read post]
[David Kopel] Restoring the right to bear arms, New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruen
9 Aug 2022, 9:19 am
States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court overturn Roe v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am
” At the Duke Center for Firearms Law’s Second Thoughts blog, Jacob Charles looks at the implications of Rehaif v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm
Jacob Rowbottom and Richard Wingfield. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 7:22 am
This will be strictly regulated and product will need to be labelled as for export.Laëtitia Bénard Laëtitia Bénard (Allen & Overy LLP, Paris) then moved to Recent Developments on SPCs, in particular the CJEU decision in the Teva v Gilead case. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 4:22 am
Mr Justice Nugee heard the application and what follows is taken from the transcript.He was keen from the outset to inspect the physical samples of the products, confirming the approach to registered design cases advocated by Sir Robin Jacob in Dyson v Vax:“What really matters is what the court can see with its own eyes. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 2:57 am
UK courts would also be in a better position to move away from unpopular CJEU decisions: the panel pointed to L’Oreal v Bellure (C-487/07) as a good example of this (in which many, including Sir Robin Jacob, criticised the CJEU for finding that “smell-alike” perfumes can infringe trade marks, even in a situation where the seller tells the buyer that the perfume is a smell-alike) (see hereand here) [But what will be the relevance of CJEU judgments issued before… [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 6:32 am
Sir Robin wants to make the payers paySir Robin Jacob (UCL) considers second medical use a very serious subject and, indeed, the biggest topic on this year's Fordham agenda. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 9:11 am
No, the IPKat isn't going into the plumbing business: it's just that his attention has been attracted to another design protection matter that is now heading to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) for a preliminary ruling, Case C-361/15 P - Easy Sanitary Solutions BV v Group Nivelles. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:39 am
When asked if he thought copyright harmonisation could (and should) be achieved, his view was that it was a matter for the legislature to decide upon. [read post]
8 Jun 2014, 1:51 pm
In this decision (which has been labelled by many a ‘results based decision’), it clearly did not matter to the CJEU that the original licence was non-transferable. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:10 pm
The AmeriKat was too busy being angry about the Commission's response to a question on the UPC to attend, but one of her wonderful colleagues, Steven Baldwin (Allen & Overy LLP), attended. [read post]
