Search for: "Matter of John D." Results 1 - 20 of 6,791
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2024, 9:00 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Chief Justice John Weimer dissented, as did Justices William Crain and Jay McCallum.The plaintiffs and the State’s Attorney General asked the court to rehear the case. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 7:17 am by Will Yeatman
(As a related aside, I discussed this matter some years ago on this blog). [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 4:20 am by Greg Lambert
So the Southern California Association law libraries, the newsletter committee, and one of the things I got to do as part of that was interviewed John Perry Barlow, who was one of the cofounders of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, the EFF. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 7:41 am by AccelerateEditor
Beyond legal penalties, such actions can exacerbate the situation and complicate matters further. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 5:49 am by Ezequiel Heffes
The FARC-EP, for instance, noted in its “Estatuto” (Statute) that this document “essentially formulate[d] the ideological foundations of the [NSAG], define[d] its organizational structure, the command regime, the duties and rights of combatants and other basic principles of the revolutionary organization” (at 5-6, translated by author). [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Former CIA Director John Brennan, one of the 50 who signed the letter, also claimed that the laptop bore “the hallmarks of Russian disinformation. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
As a matter of numbers, the exodus is not history-making. [read post]
31 May 2024, 9:40 am by Daniel J. Gilman
But that’s partly why this all matters, and should be gotten right. [read post]
30 May 2024, 4:40 am by Beatrice Yahia
Henry Cuellar (D-TX), who was recently indicted in a federal bribery case. [read post]
29 May 2024, 11:55 pm by David Pocklington
It seemed to be more a matter of taste than a serious question of historical significance. [read post]
29 May 2024, 3:52 pm by Reference Staff
For scholarly publications, Rule 10.7.1(d) adds a descriptive parenthetical note for citing cases where an enslaved person was involved, and provides examples like “Wall v. [read post]