Search for: "Matter of Jonathan R. v Michael R."
Results 1 - 20
of 173
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2024, 3:06 am
For example, Michael Waldman, president of New York University’s Brennan Center for Justice, noted that in 1974 the Court considered United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2024, 12:26 pm
Hardin-Tammons (for more on the earlier 13 cases, see these posts): Jonathan R. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 12:05 pm
Jonathan F. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 4:57 am
Humeyra Pamuk, Jonathan Saul, and Maggie Fick report for Reuters. [read post]
2 Sep 2023, 11:21 pm
The Grand Chamber relied upon the judgment of the UK Supreme Court in R v The Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis of 15 February 2017. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
R. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
The Securities and Exchange Commission regulations on climate disclosure, first proposed in March 2022 and likely to be issued in final form in October 2023,[1] have drawn considerable controversy and face an uncertain fate in the inevitable litigation.[2] Much less attention has gone to two bills that are moving toward adoption in California. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
Moritz, decided Mar. 31 by the Nebraska Supreme Court (in an opinion by Justice John Freudenberg, joined by Chief Justice Michael Heavican and Justices Stephanie Stacy and Jonathan Papik): At issue in this appeal is whether social media posts directed toward local public figures from a public account of an officer of a local bank constituted misconduct in connection with work disqualifying the employee from unemployment benefits. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
Well done, BCA can favor major regulations, such as phasing out CFCs, reducing particulate matter air pollution, and sound climate policy.[12] The challenge is to get beyond “tunnel vision,”[13] and to counteract “disregard” of impacts and affected subgroups.[14]Assessing all important impacts helps overcome these cognitive limitations, and the “omitted voice” of underrepresented subgroups, by pressing policy makers to think more holistically and… [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am
The cases include those brought by the Duke of Sussex, Nikki Sanderson, Fiona Wightman and Michael Turner. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm
Although I am not a Jew, I am, following Jonathan Miller, “Jew-ish, just not the whole hog. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling that struck down Roe v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 7:19 am
(“No serious congressional scholar believes that Congress speaks clearly when addressing major questions as a descriptive matter. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
He credits them (specifically, Michael McConnell) with having changed his mind about a number of important legal issues, in particular, the constitutionality of vouchers (used for religious school tuition), which he came to regard as not unconstitutional or as nonjusticiable—that is, an issue for the legislatures, not the courts, to decide. [read post]
24 May 2022, 6:07 am
Jonathan Chaplin, Theos: Democratic deliberation and deep diversity: “What it would take to debate assisted dying honestly”. (30 September 2021). [read post]
27 Mar 2022, 4:50 pm
There was a post on the Privacy Matters blog. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Arbitrator Michael Leb, who concluded the firing process “was tainted. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 6:02 am
" Here is the abstract: Mistakes matter in law, even the smallest ones. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 7:22 am
R. 35(b). [read post]
