Search for: "Matter of Landmark West! v Burden"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2024, 10:30 pm
Some contextual challenges of EU law vis-à-vis LGBTIQA+ matters will also be highlighted. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 5:31 pm
In OOO Memo v. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 2:09 pm
If we think – and I suspect many don’t – that the difference matters, then to have them all swept up together under the banner of regulation is unhelpful. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 5:10 am
If we think – and I suspect many don’t - that the difference matters, then to have them all swept up together under the banner of regulation is unhelpful. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:41 am
Gravel v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
The latter role has no analogue in the United States, where the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction only over the smallest range of matters and serves almost exclusively as an appellate body. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
In this post, I look back to a landmark state constitutional decision from twenty years ago, Goodridge v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:40 pm
No matter what the Court decides, the level of deference will be significantly ratcheted down, and the universities will bear the burden of proof. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
The City argued the project was ineligible for the following reasons: (1) the project violated the City’s requirements that projects meet certain performance standards for off-site impacts and not exceed certain amount and intensity of use requirements; (2) the project was located within a three-block area designated as a City Landmark for the state-listed historical resource known as the West Berkeley Shellmound (“Shellmound”), and would have, thus, violated the… [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:55 am
The regressive nature of wireless taxes creates significant burdens on low-income consumers. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 2:16 pm
In Fulton v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 7:15 am
McCulloch v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:33 am
These episodes are often accompanied by the perceived need to give a sermon at a religious landmark. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:58 pm
On Monday, April 30, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in the matter of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 3:58 pm
On Monday, April 30, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in the matter of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 1:02 pm
On Monday, April 30, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in the matter of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm
Yi Zhang echoed Connor’s ideas of mutual influence between the East and the West. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 10:35 am
We rated the decision that the Texas Supreme Court just reversed, Centocor, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 3:11 am
” See West River Bridge v. [read post]