Search for: "Matter of M. M. v A. A." Results 1 - 20 of 15,483
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Smith v. Arizona: The Supreme Court decisively rejects the “in support of the opinion” end run
25 Jun 2024, 3:07 pm
But five justices had rejected that theory in Williams v. [read post]
The Confrontation Blog - http://confrontationright.blogspot.com/
[Josh Blackman] The Three Trump Appointees In Rahimi
25 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm by Josh Blackman
United States v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
The Indian Satellite Saga and Retaliation: Recognizing the Supreme Court of India’s Judgment Abroad?
24 Jun 2024, 7:03 pm by Jeanne Huang
When rejecting the enforcement of the ICC award, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that a minimum contacts analysis should be satisfied.[21] Notably, the Australian Federal Court did not consider the legality of investment under the applicable bilateral investment treaty and the validity of the arbitration agreement because, when determining sovereign immunity, Devas needed only to provide prima facie evidence that a valid arbitration agreement existed.[22] The US District Court for… [read post]
Conflict of Laws .net - https://conflictoflaws.net
Trump’s Special Counsel Hearings: Judge Appears Concerned Over Jack Smith’s Funding
24 Jun 2024, 10:37 am by Adam Klasfeld
“I think that’s true of both sides of this matter,” Pearce said. [read post]
Just Security - https://www.justsecurity.org/
[Ilya Somin] The Supreme Court's Dubious Use of History in Department of State v. Munoz
24 Jun 2024, 8:00 am by Ilya Somin
  (emphasis added); see also 2 Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, p. 238 (M. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Eugene Volokh] Federal Low-Security Inmate Punished Based on Public TikTok Video Showing Him Making Contraband Lobster
24 Jun 2024, 5:22 am by Eugene Volokh
Gwen M. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Eugene Volokh] Claim That Public School Employee Was Unconstitutionally Fired for Sharp Pro-COVID-Vaccine Post Can Go Forward
24 Jun 2024, 5:06 am by Eugene Volokh
Ceballos (2006), or the speech is on a matter of purely private concern, Connick v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Department of State v. Munoz: The Sleeper ConLaw Case of the Term
23 Jun 2024, 8:38 pm by Josh Blackman
The Act made no exception for spouses—or, for that matter, other family members. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[Josh Blackman] Can an Amicus ask the Supreme Court to Overrule a Case Where the Parties Don't?
21 Jun 2024, 5:47 pm by Josh Blackman
John M. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
[John Ross] Short Circuit: A Roundup of Recent Federal Court Decisions
21 Jun 2024, 1:00 pm by John Ross
New on the Bound By Oath podcast: In Kelo v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
For Rahimi: Two Cheers (the Result and the Methodology) and a Few Jeers
21 Jun 2024, 11:45 am by Michael C. Dorf
Three days later, in Kennedy v. [read post]
Dorf on Law - http://www.dorfonlaw.org/
The CJEU ruling on BASMATI (C‑801/21 P) is out – Summary and prospects on the outcome of APE TEES and SHOPPI
21 Jun 2024, 12:35 am by Verena von Bomhard (BomhardIP) and Annemarie Malkmes (Bomhard IP)
This would mean that the EUIPO’s appeal in APE TEES (EUIPO v Nowhere, C-337/22 P, see also here) would be successful, as in that case, the GC had – surprisingly – considered that what mattered was the date of application of the opposed EUTM. [read post]
KluwerTrademarkBlog - http://trademarkblog.kluweriplaw.com/
[Josh Blackman] Counting The Votes In An Unusual Per Curiam Opinion in Gonzalez v. Trevino
20 Jun 2024, 7:39 am by Josh Blackman
Today the Supreme Court decided Gonzalez v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
Pay what you owe or talk to the hand (what’s a Hadkinson order when it’s at home?)
19 Jun 2024, 1:39 pm by familoo
Put simply, the court can say ‘I’m not listening to you until you do what the court order tells you to do. [read post]
Pink Tape - http://pinktape.co.uk
FAMILY COURT APPEAL WASN’T TIMELY PERFECTED
19 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
# # #DECISIONMatter of Trina M. v Bryant P. [read post]
Real Estate Law Blog - http://www.nyrealestatelawblog.com/
The very political New York prosecution of Donald Trump.
18 Jun 2024, 3:36 pm by Ed Folsom, Retired Maine Criminal Defense Attorney
(PBS: Photo by Michael M. [read post]
Edmund R. Folsom Law Blog - http://edfolsomlaw.com/the-law-blog
[Eugene Volokh] No Sealing of Documents in Lawsuit Alleging Prison Nurse's Falling Asleep Contributed to Inmate's Death
17 Jun 2024, 11:25 am by Eugene Volokh
From Thursday's decision by Judge David Larimer in Carey v. [read post]
The Volokh Conspiracy - http://www.volokh.com/
"Schools are under a duty to adequately supervise the students in their charge and they will be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d 44, 49; see D.M. v Yonkers City Sch. Dist., 220 AD3d 672). "Schools are not insurers of safety, however, for they cannot reasonably be expected to continuously supervise and control all movements and activities of students" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d at 49; see R.B. v Sewanhaka Cent. High Sch. Dist., 207 AD3d 607, 609).
17 Jun 2024, 11:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
ENTER: Darrell M. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
"Schools are under a duty to adequately supervise the students in their charge and they will be held liable for foreseeable injuries proximately related to the absence of adequate supervision" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d 44, 49; see D.M. v Yonkers City Sch. Dist., 220 AD3d 672). "Schools are not insurers of safety, however, for they cannot reasonably be expected to continuously supervise and control all movements and activities of students" (Mirand v City of New York, 84 NY2d at 49; see R.B. v Sewanhaka Cent. High Sch. Dist., 207 AD3d 607, 609).
17 Jun 2024, 11:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
ENTER: Darrell M. [read post]
New York Public Personnel Law - https://publicpersonnellaw.blogspot.com/
Law and Media Round Up – 17 June 2024
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
The High Court held that the claimant had no real prospect of establishing that the reviews caused, or were likely to cause, serious reputational harm, either as a matter of fact or by inference. [read post]
Inforrm's Blog - https://inforrm.wordpress.com/