Search for: "Matter of M. M. v A. A." Results 1 - 20 of 15,483
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2024, 7:03 pm by Jeanne Huang
When rejecting the enforcement of the ICC award, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that a minimum contacts analysis should be satisfied.[21] Notably, the Australian Federal Court did not consider the legality of investment under the applicable bilateral investment treaty and the validity of the arbitration agreement because, when determining sovereign immunity, Devas needed only to provide prima facie evidence that a valid arbitration agreement existed.[22] The US District Court for… [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 8:00 am by Ilya Somin
  (emphasis added); see also 2 Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, p. 238 (M. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 8:38 pm by Josh Blackman
The Act made no exception for spouses—or, for that matter, other family members. [read post]
This would mean that the EUIPO’s appeal in APE TEES (EUIPO v Nowhere, C-337/22 P, see also here) would be successful, as in that case, the GC had – surprisingly – considered that what mattered was the date of application of the opposed EUTM. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 1:39 pm by familoo
Put simply, the court can say ‘I’m not listening to you until you do what the court order tells you to do. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
The High Court held that the claimant had no real prospect of establishing that the reviews caused, or were likely to cause, serious reputational harm, either as a matter of fact or by inference. [read post]