Search for: "Matter of Malloy" Results 1 - 20 of 101
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Former FTX Crypto Executive Pleads Guilty to Making Millions in Illegal Campaign Contributions Associated Press News – Jake Offenhartz | Published: 9/7/2023 A former top executive at the failed FTX cryptocurrency exchange pleaded guilty to making tens of millions of dollars in illegal campaign contributions and engaging in a criminal conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money transfer business. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 9:00 pm by Kyle Hulehan
Some people may possess a sense of fairness that opposes disproportionately high taxes on them as a matter of principle, but for most, what matters more is how it affects the broader public: what it does for the Commonwealth’s economy, understood in terms of jobs, growth, opportunity, and income-earning potential for individuals who will never join the rarified company of those actually remitting under the proposed surtax. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 8:01 am
Take Justice Brennan's opinion for the Court in Malloy v. [read post]
21 May 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
White House Releases Biden’s Tax Returns in Restoration of Presidential Tradition CNN – Jason Hoffman, Maegan Vazquez, and Allie Malloy | Published: 5/17/2021 The White House released the 2020 tax returns for both President Biden and Vice President Harris, restoring a presidential tradition that had been ignored under former President Trump. [read post]
19 May 2021, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Campaign Finance California: “California Recall Candidates Use Auto-Donation Tactic Trump Made Famous” by Jeremy White for Politico Elections Arizona: “‘Our Democracy Is Imperiled’: Maricopa County officials decry 2020 recount as a sham and call on Arizona Republicans to end the process” by Rosalind Helderman (Washington Post) for MSN Ethics National: “Biden Administration’s Deep Ties to Uber, Lyft in Spotlight After Vaccine-Assistance Partnership… [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 10:20 am by Josh Blackman
Shortly before I presented the paper, then-Governor Malloy talked about the urgent need for gun control laws to deal with the tragedy in his state. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:36 am by Arnold Wadsworth Coggins
¶5 We agree with Malloy‘s first point as a matter of Fourth Amendment principles. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 4:36 am by Peter Mahler
In her decision, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Nancy Bannon denied both prongs of Malloy‘s motion. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 11:56 am by Adam Klein, Benjamin Wittes
Malloy, the court held that Connecticut’s temporary quarantine, “limited in duration to the incubation period of a virus responsible for an epidemic that killed over 11,000 individuals, was not objectively unreasonable. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 2:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Total Income Under $22,200 Total Income Between $22,000 and $79,300 Total Income Above $79,300 Income Bracket Tax Rate Income Bracket Tax Rate Income Bracket  Tax Rate $0-$4,499 0.0% $0-$4,499 0.75% $0-$4,000 2.0% $4,500-$8,899 2.0% $4,500-$8,899 2.50% $4,001-$8,000 4.0% $8,900-$13,399 3.0% $8,900-$13,399 3.50% $8,001-$79,300 5.9% $13,400-$22,199 3.4% $13,400-$22,199 4.50% $79,301+ 6.6%     $22,200-$37,199 5.00%         $37,200-$79,300 5.90%    … [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
If so, why did those originalist and textualist standards not defeat the constitutional claim in Malloy v. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal ‘C’est Moi’: Mitt Romney admits to running secret Twitter account under the alias ‘Pierre Delecto’ MSN – Allyson Chiu (Washington Post) | Published: 10/21/2019 For years, Pierre Delecto’s presence on Twitter largely went unnoticed. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 11:17 am by Green, Schafle & Gibbs
The findings stated that the matter arose from an amendment to a Form U5 filed by Malloy’s member firm that reported allegations that he had made unsuitable recommendations in the accounts of customers who alleged they lost $1 million as a result of his misconductJay R. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
New York,3 that the Supreme Court matter-of-factly held that the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment was “of course” applicable to the states.4 To justify incorporation, Penn Central cited only one 19th century case, which itself did not mention the Fifth Amendment.5 Before Penn Central, the Court relied on the Due Process Clause to restrict the scope of state taking power. [read post]