Search for: "Matter of McComb v Reasoner"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2022, 2:17 am
On 20 October 2021, the Supreme Court delivered its judgment in FS Cairo (Nile Plaza) LLC v Brownlie [2021] UKSC 45. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
At this Friday’s conference, the Supreme Court will vote to grant the last cases that will be argued this term (barring expedited briefing on some emergency matter). [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm
On the same day, judgment was handed down in the case of Tinkler v Ferguson [2021] EWCA Civ 18 (heard 16 December 2020 by Peter Jackson and Dingemans LJJ and Sir Richard McCombe). [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 4:11 pm
Rather than file a response to Giustra’s claim, Twitter sought to have the matter dismissed out of B.C. courts, arguing that California, where Twitter has its headquarters, would be the correct jurisdiction but its arguments were rejected. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am
Tinkler v Ferguson, heard 16 December 2020 (McCombe, Peter Jackson and Dingemans LJJ). [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 4:12 am
For the reasons explained below, the court finds Tagnetics, Inc. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 9:10 am
The judgment in the Court of Appeal was given by Nicola Davies LJ, with whom McCombe and Coulson LJJ agreed. [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm
In relation to the “public interest” defence, they found that the statements complained of were not on matters of public interest [50] to [58] and, moreover, that the defendant had not made out a reasonable belief that this was the case [64] to [84]. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 8:01 am
Powell turns on an assumed difference between the summary of the principles concerning the PSED in Bracking v SSWP [2013] EWCA Civ 1345, given by McCombe LJ (who also heard this appeal) and the Court of Appeal judgment in Barnsley MBC v Norton [2011] EWCA Civ 834. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 10:00 am
" Citing Matter of McComb v Reasoner, 29 AD3d 795, the Appellate Division noted that the Court of Appeals has interpreted Civil Service Law §72(2) to "require[ ] that the power to discipline be delegated, if necessary, within the governmental department's chain of command" and that the Court of Appeals has further interpreted Civil Service Law §72(2) to:1. require that the power to discipline be delegated, if necessary, within… [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 7:15 am
Brian Cordery and Rachel MumbyWise readers will know that when it comes to matters of the heart, it is often best not to interfere. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 2:14 pm
The question, in large part, was the significance of Lord Neuberger’s judgment in Hotak v Southwark London Borough Council; Kanu v Southwark London Borough Council [2016] AC 811, at paras 78 and 79 “78. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 12:37 pm
Poshteh v Royal Borough of Kensington And Chelsea [2015] EWCA Civ 711 At issue in this second appeal from a s.204 appeal was whether it was reasonable for Ms Poshteh to have refused an offer of accommodation. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 5:04 am
Co. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2015, 4:04 pm
Events 24 February 2015, “Does Privacy Matter? [read post]
15 Feb 2015, 4:24 pm
Events 24 February 2015, “Does Privacy Matter? [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 9:19 am
The most obvious reason is that respondents have retained former Solicitor General Gregory Garre – fresh from his victory in another tax shelter case last year (United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:06 pm
McCombe LJ agreed with Laws LJ. [read post]
2 Mar 2013, 1:58 am
In Jeynes v News Magazines Limited [2008] EWCA Civ 130 the Court of Appeal summarized the basic rules for determining meaning: “(1) The governing principle is reasonableness. (2) The hypothetical reasonable reader is not naïve but he is not unduly suspicious. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 1:00 pm
Study shows that as an absolute matter, fewer consumers understand information conveyed in one way v. another. [read post]
