Search for: "Matter of Q. M. v B. C."
Results 1 - 20
of 199
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2024, 4:43 am
Since most – if not all – of the important developments with respect to civil and commercial matters[8]in this area were achieved within the framework of EU Private International Law (PIL) (e.g. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Farra, Alyssa M. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Farra, Alyssa M. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
”[3] Critical Infrastructure Sector: As a threshold matter, an entity is only a Covered Entity if it belongs to one of 16 industries that qualify as critical infrastructure sectors under the Act. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 2:59 pm
Harry Potter Lexicon: “Perhaps b/c [D] is such a Harry Potter enthusiast, the Lexicon often lacks restraint in using Rowling’s original expression” Salinger v. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 10:59 am
Q: Veuve Cliquot v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
On Wednesday, I received a letter from Bryan M. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
In today’s rapidly evolving corporate landscape, the composition of boards is not just a matter of compliance or social responsibility; it’s a strategic imperative that shapes the future of firms. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:26 am
(c) The responsible development and use of AI require a commitment to supporting American workers. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 7:50 am
NRDC v. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:08 am
Tort tries to get people to make safer products to encourage innovation, but also leads to anxieties about creating new stuff b/c it risks litigation v. doing what everyone else is already doing. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 3:11 pm
RT: bifurcation might not work well b/c copying drives so much, but worth testing empirically. [read post]
16 May 2023, 1:41 pm
The term “controlled substance” means “a drug or other substance, or immediate precursor, included in schedule I, II, III, IV, or V of part B of this subchapter. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 10:51 am
Avoids problems of regulatory arbitrage. 230 v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 7:48 am
[Roche-Laguna is laughing but I’m not finding it funny that they actually can’t seem to answer those questions.] [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 12:23 pm
They walk around confused about sponsorship b/c of their priors! [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
The SG's brief responds that there is no authority for the proposition that "if A causes financial harm to B, and B owes money to C, C has standing to sue A. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 12:16 pm
GRRM hasn’t released The Winds of Winter—is the delay b/c we didn’t give him enough $, or b/c we gave him too much? [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 3:44 pm
A: loves that idea b/c it would force evaluation of commonality between the parties, which is worth looking for. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 11:29 am
”] From today's opinion by Judge Gregory Woods in Flynn v. [read post]
