Search for: "Matter of Roberts v Gavin"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2024, 4:08 am
Gavin Newsom (D) recently balked at the cost. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 5:24 am
First, in its June 30, 2022, opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts in West Virginia v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
No matter what it takes. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am
COVID-19 PANDEMIC ■David Gaska (deceased), Joan Gaska, Erica Gray, and Gavin Neil Belcher, Applicants v. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 11:29 am
Roberts, Labor Law Helpline Manager, Employment Law Counsel/Subject Matter Expert CalChamber members can read more about Expense Reimbursement in the HR Library. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 7:00 am
Finding that the employer's decision "had a rational basis in the record", the Appellate Division declined to substitute its judgment for that of the employer's, citing Matter of Roberts v Gavin, 96 AD3d 669. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 7:00 am
Finding that the employer's decision "had a rational basis in the record", the Appellate Division declined to substitute its judgment for that of the employer's, citing Matter of Roberts v Gavin, 96 AD3d 669. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 11:18 am
Though it is less well known, and before it became politically necessary for now-jurists John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett to dutifully carry out their part of the 2000 Republican strategy that resulted the 5-4 Bush v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Supreme Court Rejects Trump’s Request to Withhold Jan. 6 Materials from House Committee Investigating Capitol Riot MSN – Robert Barnes (Washington Post) | Published: 1/19/2022 The Supreme Court rejected former President Trump’s request to block the release of some of his White House records to a congressional committee investigating the January 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 9:03 pm
Supreme Court’s divided opinions in June Medical Services v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm
That meant it was a matter of law for the court to decide, the judge said. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 4:15 pm
Mishcon de Reya Data Matters had a post “ICO Opinion on live facial recognition”. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 9:45 am
Roberts, Esq.. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
In South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 2:00 am
Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
14 Nov 2019, 2:00 am
Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 4:39 pm
In Weisleder v. [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 12:36 pm
Roberts, Esq.. [read post]
6 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division's ruling states:"The article 78 court correctly determined, upon consideration of all the facts, that respondents' denial of petitioner's application for reinstatement to his former position with NYCHA was not arbitrary and capricious or an abuse of discretion (see Matter of Roberts v Gavin, 96 AD3d 669, 671 [1st Dept 2012]). [read post]
