Search for: "Matter of Rutty"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2010, 5:53 pm
See Rutti, 2010 U.S. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 5:27 pm
The district court granted Lojack summary judgment, holding that Rutti’s commute was not compensable as a matter of law and that the preliminary and postliminary activities were not compensable because they either were not integral to Rutti’s principal activities or consumed a de minimis amount of time. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 5:31 pm
The plaintiff in Rutti was a technician for Lojack, Inc. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 8:59 pm
” Rutti v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 4:59 am
” Rutti v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 9:58 am
Although Rutti filed a motion for class certification at the same time Lojack filed a motion for partial summary judgment, the district court only ruled on the summary judgment motion in disposing of Rutti’s federal claims and state law claim for commuting compensation, and later dismissed the remaining state law claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 8:38 am
Rutti v. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:47 pm
However, we vacate the district court’s grant of summary judgment on Rutti’s postliminary activity of required daily portable data transmissions, and remand the matter to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 4:00 am
Every day, we talk to people in the same “rutty” and guilt-filled situation we were in before leaving for Costa Rica. [read post]
5 May 2011, 4:25 pm
” The Ninth Circuit addressed the question last year in Rutti v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 3:43 am
Guy also objected to the prosecutor's statement that he stood behind the officer and the investigation in the matter. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 6:40 am
“When the matter in issue concerns only a few seconds or minutes of work beyond the scheduled working hours, such trifles may be disregarded. [read post]
