Search for: "Matter of Seidman" Results 1 - 20 of 101
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
  National/Federal Congressional Hearing on the Biden Classified Documents Probe Turns into a Proxy Campaign Battle Associated Press News – Zeke Miller, Colleen Long, and Farnoush Amiri | Published: 3/12/2024 Lawmakers turned a hearing on President Biden’s handling of classified documents into a proxy battle between the Democratic president and Donald Trump, as a newly released transcript of Biden’s last fall showed he repeatedly insisted he never meant to retain… [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:31 pm by admin
., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) (No. 92-102) (“peer review referees and editors limit their assessment of submitted articles to such matters as style, plausibility, and defensibility; they do not duplicate experiments from scratch or plow through reams of computer-generated data in order to guarantee accuracy or veracity or certainty”), with Brief for Amici Curiae New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of the American Medical Association, and Annals of Internal Medicine in Support of… [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 4:41 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” A universe of case law has evolved applying the BDO Seidman test. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:19 am by INFORRM
The Press Gazette notes that one of the big factors judges take into account when assessing privacy claims is the extent to which claimants have put matters into the public domain themselves. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 5:50 pm by Samuel Bray
I never argue it is only about causation, and I'm not sure why my argument would not matter if it is about incidental powers. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 5:10 am by Robert Brammer
Professor Tushnet is the co-author of four casebooks, including a casebook on constitutional law, Constitutional Law (with Stone, Seidman, and Sunstein). [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
Pre-reflective intuitions and the views assumed by our actual practices are a good starting point for moral reasoning, but they are hardly the end of the matter. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 2:15 pm by Eugene Volokh
" see, e.g., Gary Lawson & Guy Seidman, Downsizing the Right to Petition, 93 Nw. [read post]
20 May 2022, 1:56 pm by David Kopel
[A reply to Professor Andrew Koppelman] In the Arizona Law Review, Professor Andrew Koppelman asks the provocative question Why Do (Some) Originalists Hate America? [read post]
7 May 2022, 12:38 pm by Russell Knight
The appellate court can review the matter de novo with zero regard to whatever was said previously. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Ferriero said the agency had been in touch with the Justice Department over the matter. [read post]
4 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Campaigning to Oversee Elections, While Denying the Last One Yahoo News – Jennifer Medina, Nick Corasaniti, and Reid Epstein (New York Times) | Published: 1/30/2022 Nearly two dozen Republicans who have publicly questioned or disputed the results of the 2020 election are running for secretary of state across the country, in some cases after being directly encouraged by allies of former President Trump. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Challenges to the Voting Rights Act Far from Over Center for Public Integrity – Carrie Levine | Published: 12/1/2021 When the U.S. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:01 am by Robert Corn-Revere
" This same theme is the focus of Professor Louis Michael Seidman's 2018 article, Can Free Speech Be Progressive? [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 5:01 am by Robert Corn-Revere
" This same theme is the focus of Professor Louis Michael Seidman's 2018 article, Can Free Speech Be Progressive? [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:21 am by Vercammen Law
IN THE MATTER OF THEESTATE OF ANN GRISCHUK,Deceased.___________________________ Submitted January 11, 2021 – Decided July 27, 2021 Before Judges Sabatino and DeAlmeida. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 5:01 am by Michael Ramsey
Chief Justice Marshall considered the matter directly in Loughborough v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 5:01 am by Michael Ramsey
Chief Justice Marshall considered the matter directly in Loughborough v. [read post]