Search for: "Matter of Smith v Stanford" Results 1 - 20 of 92
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm by Josh Blackman
[The issues, arguments, and evidence raised by Mikhail have already been addressed by extant scholarship, including our scholarship. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm by Josh Blackman
As we read the brief, the Amars have retreated from the central position they put forward in an influential 1995 Stanford Law Review article. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 9:57 am by Evan Schwartz
App. 1988), review denied, 439 N.W.2d 142 (Wis. 1989) 2 Smith v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Wrestling with Religious Diversity, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 3:26 pm by Eugene Volokh
Smith (D.R.I.); Judge Smith expresses his disapproval of D.C. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm by admin
Rakoff, Judge, Southern District of New York Channing Robertson, Professor of Engineering, Stanford University Joseph V. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
If the Court wanted to go down the path of emphasizing subjective motivations, it would have decided Trump v. [read post]
4 Nov 2020, 5:36 pm by Amy Howe
Jeffrey Fisher, the Stanford law professor who argued on behalf of two Philadelphia-area nonprofit groups that entered the case to defend the city’s policy, told the justices that because CSS was a government contractor, all that matters is whether the government’s position was reasonable. [read post]
4 Oct 2020, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
Mishcon de Reya Data Matters had a post “Further delay in proposed ICO GDPR fine for Marriott”. [read post]
28 Jun 2020, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Mishcon de Reya Data Matters had a post. [read post]