Search for: "Matter of Smith v Stewart"
Results 1 - 20
of 139
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2024, 7:34 am
Stewart, 23PA22, ___ N.C. ___ (May 23, 2024). [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 1:00 pm
According to the denial of rehearing order, In the en banc poll, eight judges voted in favor of rehearing (Chief Judge Richman and Judges Jones, Smith, Elrod, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Oldham), and nine judges voted against rehearing (Judges Stewart, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett, Wilson, Douglas, and Ramirez). [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 8:09 am
” Smith v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 1:31 pm
Calcutt v. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 6:16 pm
First Instance Stewart J found the Federal Court was not a clearly inappropriate forum and declined to stay the proceedings. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:12 am
Anthony List v. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
" Exactly the sort of case, one would think, that federal courts must, as a constitutional matter, decline to hear, for the simple reason that it does not yet exist (and may never exist—see below). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 3:35 am
Here are the directions to Stewart and Mike’s wedding. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 5:16 am
The plaintiff in Gonzalez v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 4:31 am
For example, in her forceful dissent in West Virginia v. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 4:25 am
” Thirteen judges agreed with the conclusion though twelve (Chief Judge Richman and Judges Jones, Smith, Stewart, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Wilson) reversed on lenity grounds while eight members (Judges Jones, Smith, Elrod, Willett, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson) reversed on the ground that federal law unambiguously fails to cover non-mechanical bump stocks. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 4:07 pm
Twelve members (Chief Judge Richman and Judges Jones, Smith, Stewart, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Wilson) reverse on lenity grounds. [read post]
30 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
On Jan. 8, a grand jury charged eleven members of the Oath Keepers paramilitary group, including its founder, Elmer Stewart Rhodes, III, with seditious conspiracy—the first use of that charge in more than a decade. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 2:57 am
The court directed the parties to file written submissions on 8 November 2022 and reply submissions on 10 November 2022 to allow the Judge to decide the matter on paper. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 12:26 pm
The majority opinion was written by Judge Jones, and was joined by Chief Judge Richman and Judges Smith, Stewart, Dennis, Southwick, Haynes, Costa, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, and Wilson. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 7:48 am
One possibility is for courts to do so as a matter of statutory interpretation. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
As a practical matter, the distinction between rescheduling and relisting is great. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm
Smith, and if so, whether the Supreme Court should overrule Smith. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 7:07 am
These deficiencies in not answering matters raised by Dr Camden-Smith fatally flaw the Respondent’s decisions. [read post]
