Search for: "Matter of Strickland"
Results 1 - 20
of 522
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2024, 4:01 am
Licence Appeal Tribunal (“LAT”) in 2019, due to the matter being time-barred, Ms. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:43 am
This post summarizes the published criminal opinions from the North Carolina Court of Appeals released on March 5, 2024. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:53 pm
However, this is not quite what Cromwell J. says in Strickland, although he does say he sees “no reason to doubt” that is the case (Strickland, para. 64). [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 12:55 pm
Strickland, 321 N.C. 31, 39, 361 S.E.2d 882, 886–87 (1987) (prior assaults); Morgan, 315 N.C. at 635, 340 S.E.2d at 90 (same); but see State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 1:28 pm
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 5:53 am
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit violated this court’s precedents by employing a flawed methodology for assessing prejudice under Strickland v. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 12:44 pm
Strickland v. [read post]
15 Oct 2023, 10:39 am
Strickland , Marc-Joseph Gansah , Brian M. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 8:28 pm
Strickland, 318 N.C. 653, 656, 351 S.E.2d 281, 283 (1987) (same); cf. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 2:38 pm
But on further review, the Supreme Court unanimously held that the judgment in the FTCA case, under that act’s “judgment bar,” constitutes a complete bar to any action based on the same subject matter. [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 7:38 am
The Court of Appeals took up defendant’s current appeal and applied the two-prong analysis from Strickland v. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 5:56 pm
Strickland, 77 N.C. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 1:57 am
Strickland, 531 F.3d 406, 408 (6th Cir. 2008). [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:04 am
But this position flatly contradicts unambiguous directives issued by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court regarding the handling of death penalty matters on collateral review. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 12:54 pm
Garnier, 22-324Issue: Whether a public official engages in state action subject to the First Amendment by blocking an individual from the official’s personal social-media account, when the official uses the account to feature their job and communicate about job-related matters with the public, but does not do so pursuant to any governmental authority or duty. [read post]
15 Apr 2023, 4:47 pm
Sapp & Sturgill PLLC and Duncan Strickland continue to file lawsuits in the Western and Northern Districts for plaintiffs who, amazingly enough, always live within 30 miles of the business they sue, no matter where it is. [read post]
Can fishermen be required to pay for federal monitors? And by the way – should Chevron be overruled?
30 Mar 2023, 10:31 am
But in addition to that plain-vanilla administrative law question, the petition has a second question that is a potential blockbuster: Whether the court should overrule Chevron or at least clarify whether statutory silence about the matter of payment constitutes an ambiguity requiring deference to the agency. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 10:18 am
The case, Strickland v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 10:18 am
The case, Strickland v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 10:18 am
The case, Strickland v. [read post]
