Search for: "Matter of Tillman"
Results 1 - 20
of 256
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2024, 10:05 pm
" Tillman and I thought this passage was significant. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:08 am
Tillman, 23-6304Issue: Whether the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments guarantee the right to a trial by a 12-person jury when the defendant is charged with a felony. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 12:46 pm
[No matter how you slice it, Smith cannot exercise the powers he purports to exercise.] [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 9:33 am
" He challenges every assumption, no matter how widely adopted, by bringing forward intellectual communities that have long since faded away. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
3 Mar 2024, 12:24 pm
Contra Shugerman, it does not matter if Congress authorized ad [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
Part V reexamines case law that Blackman and Tillman rely on. [read post]
25 Feb 2024, 2:44 pm
We had thought that had ended the matter. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
”] [This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:16 pm
[Blackman & Tillman,] Part III, supra, at 424–28. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Trump prioritized this argument in his briefs to the Court, drawing primarily on the scholarship of Seth Barrett Tillman and his co-author, Josh Blackman. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:14 am
See Local Matters, Richmond Daily Dispatch (11/12/1868) at 1. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
The Tillman-Blackman Approach From the earliest days, Tillman and I recognized a way that would reconcile the state's power to regulate local officials and national officials. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 1:28 pm
He did not necessarily defend the case as being correct as an original matter, but rather explained that Griffin's Case settled the matter. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 11:37 am
Indeed, since 2012 Tillman has expressly declined to take a position on this issue. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 9:20 am
Tillman Br. at 14. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
As a threshold matter, this provision expressly contrasts between Senators and Representatives, who are elected, and "any civil Office[s] under the Authority of the United States," which are appointed. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
And strangely, Part II-A of Professor Tillman’s brief devotes six pages to arguing (mistakenly) that “[i]n the Constitution of 1788, the President did not hold an ‘Office … under the United States,'” without arguing that the same is true in Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment—let alone that the alleged limited meaning of that phrase in 1788 is a reason for reversing the Colorado Supreme Court.) [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 7:54 pm
[This post is co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] On January 18, Professor Akhil Reed Amar and Professor Vikram Amar filed an amicus brief in Trump v. [read post]
