Search for: "Matter of Wilson v Stanford" Results 1 - 20 of 66
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Oct 2023, 12:00 am by INFORRM
The Brett Wilson Media Law blog published an article analysing the current case law relating to the serious harm provision under s. 1 of the Defamation Act 2013, which is available to read here. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Proxy Season: Proxy Voting, Governance, and ES Matters Posted by Laura D. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 6:30 am
Proxy Season: Proxy Voting, Governance, and ES Matters Posted by Laura D. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  I first became aware of this in a brilliant essay by Stanford historian Jonathan Gnienapp that was published in a book that I edited on nullification and secession in contemporary constitutional theory. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 3:42 pm by Chuck Cosson
This understanding of human nature makes itself known in both privacy and data security matters. [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Madison, and the Missouri Crisis are told alongside less familiar ones like Martin v. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm by Chris Castle
  For example, Stanford hosted a July 2007 Pirate Party cash-preferred political fundraiser for anonymous donors that also had stops at the Googleplex[1] and the O’Reilly conference. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
  The Brett Wilson blog had a post as did 5RB. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has coverage as has INFORRM from Iain Wilson and Elisabeth Mason. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Malpractice and Tort Law Marc Ginsberg, The John Marshall Law School (Chicago), Cross-Disciplinary Expert Testimony In Medical Negligence Litigation Mark Hall, Wake Forest University, The Restatement (Third) of Medical Liability Michelle Mello, Stanford University, Practice Changes Among Medical Malpractice "Frequent Flyers" Alix Rogers, Stanford Law School, Neither Property Nor Tort: The Curious Case of Quasi-Property of Human Bodily Remains D. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 12:01 pm by David Engstrom
Liza Starr, a student at Stanford Law School and a member of Stanford’s Supreme Court Clinic, co-authored this post. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Brett Wilson’s Media Law Blog has covered the case of Doyle v Smith [2018] EWHC 2935 (QB), which concerned the liability of a blogger for comments regarding a planning dispute. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
The BBC has a news story about the recent case of Doyle v Smith entitled “Caddington Village News blogger sued for libel over fraud claims” Lexisnexis has conducted an interview of Brett Wilson Managing Partner Ian Wilson discussing the issues around using parliamentary privilege to undermine injunctions, using the recent incident involving Lord Hain as a case study. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
The Australian actor, Rebel Wilson, was refused permission to take her case to the High Court of Australia. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Mishcon de Reya’s Data Matters blog has provided useful context on this matter. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Stanford Cyberlaw Blog provides analysis as to the lacuna’s in the protection of net neutrality that have been created, drawing from the resulting committee report. [read post]
17 Jun 2018, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
Capitol Visitor Center, HVC-200, 1st Street NE, Washington, DC Information Law and Policy Centre’s Annual Conference on 23 November 2018 at IALS, London Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia In the case of Bauer Media v Wilson (No.2) ([2018] VSCA 154) the Victoria Court of Appeal reduced Rebel Wilson’s damages award in her defamation case from AUS$4.6 to AUS$600,000. [read post]