Search for: "Matter of ZZ" Results 1 - 20 of 33
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by News Desk
The FDA may take further action if the company does not adequately address this matter. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
It remitted the matter to the Supreme Court  for a hearing . [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 7:07 am by Joel R. Brandes
            In Matter of Austin ZZ v Aimee A, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2021 WL 624156, 2021 N.Y. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:29 am by Joel R. Brandes
Jessica ZZ., 159 A.D.3d 18, 69 N.Y.S.3d 887 [3d Dept. 2018], lv denied 31 N.Y.3d 909, 2018 WL 2924972 [2018]. [read post]
13 Jul 2017, 10:00 am by ASAD KHAN
Failure to refer to the indicative factors mentioned in Com (2009) 313 did not matter. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 3:40 pm by Jacob Sapochnick
Under these directives, officers will prioritize efforts to remove individuals who: Have been convicted of any criminal offense; Have been charged with any criminal offense that has not been resolved; Have committed acts which constitute a chargeable criminal offense; Have engaged in fraud or willful misrepresentation in connection with any official matter before a governmental agency; Have abused any program related to receipt of public benefits; Are subject to a final order of removal but… [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 7:02 pm by Adam Levitin
 Have for different categories of product data fields A through Z pre-defined (perhaps by regulation, perhaps by industry agreement), and then allow institutions to add on their own customized fields AA through ZZ, etc. [read post]
14 Jun 2014, 2:53 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The Court, however, is never bound to follow any particular recommendation as held in Matter of Erika R., Matter of Jasen P.M. and Matter of Dennis ZZ. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
As a matter of fact, the original disclosure does not even expressly refer to these different categories of SFCs. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 5:49 am by Joel R. Brandes
         In the Matter of Hailey ZZ., No. 103, NYLJ 1202558306160, at *1 (June 7, 2012) the Court of Appeals  resolved a conflict within the Appellate Divisions as to whether Family Court may direct continuing contact between parent and child once parental rights have been terminated in a contested proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law §384-b, and held that the Family Court lacks this authority. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 1:17 pm by lennyesq
Resolving a split among the four departments of the Appellate Division, the state Court of Appeals last week held that Family Courts have no authority under  Social Services Law § 384-b involuntary termination of parental rights proceedings, to order post-TPR contacts between the respondent parent and the child. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 6:17 pm by Ira Meislik
As to duration, we can talk of a lot more than guarantying “the first two years” or all obligations first accruing before until XX/YY/ZZ. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 10:08 am by Ted Folkman
Let’s leave aside the point about whether that omission matters, or whether, on the other hand, a reasonable person would have known that the promise of confidentiality would have to yield to a subpoena. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 3:44 am by Larry Bache
XL Specialty Insurance Company, where the court stated: To resolve the challenge to the expert’s opinion testimony, the Court … conducts a “rigorous” three-part inquiry into whether: (1) the expert is qualified to testify competently regarding the matters he intends to address; (2) the methodology by which the expert reaches his conclusions is sufficiently reliable; and (3) the testimony assists the trier of fact, through the application of scientific, technical,… [read post]