Search for: "Matter of the Adoption of BGH"
Results 1 - 20
of 53
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Mar 2024, 5:29 pm
, no matter how desirable it may be. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:18 am
It presents newly adopted legal instruments and summarizes current projects that are making their way through the EU legislative process. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
The same documents D20 and D21 as used in the opposition proceedings concerning the patent in suit were invoked against the subject-matter of the application in suit. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 3:39 am
German Federal Court of Justice (BGH) decisions. [read post]
4 Sep 2023, 8:45 am
Hence, the dualist regime in matters of arbitration was preserved. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:49 am
Nevertheless, the report of the European Parliament finally adopted, together with the Draft Directive of 10 March 2021, no longer contained such rule on international jurisdiction, without explanation. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 8:31 am
Yet, the BGH considered it ‘clear’ what should be done to comply with CJEU case law. [read post]
26 Jul 2022, 2:53 pm
The settlement didn’t end the matter. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 4:01 am
The special provisions for proceedings in adoption matters do not apply in recognition proceedings, which has consequences for the remedies a [read post]
5 Jul 2021, 4:39 am
This provision is only one of the several provisions adopted by th [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:20 am
Accordingly, in the opinion of the authors, for future German jurisdiction much will depend on whether the BGH adapts its previous case law to that of the CJEU. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 5:37 pm
In 2008, the EU legislator adopted the Maintenance Regulation. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 12:08 pm
It’s time for the seventh volume of Retromark, Darren Meale (Simmons & Simmons)’s rundown of notable trade mark cases over the past six months.Over to Darren:Retromark Volume VII: the last six months in trade marksIt’s now three years since I began Retromark, and we are on to a seventh volume. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 3:10 pm
While this latter criterion may have appeared to simply refer to the place of the causal event of Art 7(2) Brussels Ia in light of the Court of Justice’s decision in Case C-360/12 Coty Germany, [34] (an interpretation recently adopted by the German Federal Court (BGH 9 Nov 2017 – I ZR 164/16)), the Court of Justice had never specified its interpretation in cases of online infringements. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Still Eleonora reports on the adoption of the DSM directive by the European Parliament. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
But one of the requirements is that the ISP and other intermediaries to have "adopted and reasonably implemented … a policy that provides for the termination in appropriate circumstances of subscribers … who are repeat infringers. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 10:07 am
The German BGH and the Austrian OGH took fairly different approaches, the former granting immunity to Greece because of the haircut, the latter proceeding towards examining the heads of international jurisdiction under the Brussels Ibis Regulation. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 1:32 am
The proposal aims to fill the gap left in EU private international law following the adoption of the Rome I Regulation, when it was not possible to reach a settlement of this difficult and controversial issue. [read post]
14 May 2018, 8:32 am
The BGH decision might help refine further the terms of such fundamental debate. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 1:22 am
Following the conclusions by AG Szpunar, the CJEU now has decided the case in diametrical opposition to the earlier judgment of the BGH, by adopting a purely succession-oriented characterisation. [read post]
