Search for: "Matthews v. Jones"
Results 1 - 20
of 246
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 5:00 am
In the wake of the announced boycott against Columbia University, I posed several questions to Judge Matthew Solomson of the U.S. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 1:38 am
Philip Jones, Ecclesiastical Law: Clergy Discipline and Confidentiality: Gadd v Peers. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 7:59 am
Compare the Jones case with State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am
The claim concerns a tweet published by Matthew Hancock MP last January which accused the claimant, Andrew Bridgen MP, of promoting an anti-Semitic, anti-vax theory. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
It is now subject to the same test that Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart once used to identify pornography in the case Jacobellis v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 12:33 am
There was also an extension application by the Claimant and an application by the Defendant for strike out and/or summary judgment before HH Lewis in the case of Matthews v Wakefield Metropolitan District Council KB-2023-002991. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 1:45 am
On the same day Collins Rice J will hand down judgment in the case of WFZ v BBC. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Blake & Anor v Fox [2024] EWHC 146 (KB). [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1] This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
29 Dec 2023, 2:52 pm
Jones, No. 1:11-cv-0718, 2013 WL 1164929, at *6 (E.D. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 9:01 pm
Five months later, however, “the once-benevolent appellate gods threw me a curveball” (41) with Jones v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 8:42 am
Baird and Jones v. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
This paper is much narrower—Sunstein is really unpacking some of the conservative SCOTUS bloc’s internal debates about the MQD in Biden v. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 11:56 pm
[With thanks to Matthew Chinery for bringing this to our attention.] [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 10:30 pm
See Clark v. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 3:48 am
Matthew Luxmoore reports for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 10:44 am
Norton, is a collaboration of Columbia University data scientist Chris Wiggins and historian Matthew Jones. [read post]
28 Dec 2022, 2:45 pm
Jones, providing that for a hierarchical church (i.e., a church organized where local branches are situated within a larger structural tier), the secular tribunal should defer to the decision of the church’s hierarchical authority; and (2) the “neutral principles” method endorsed in the 1979 case Jones v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
Jones v Respect the Will of the People, 517 P.3d 1188 (AZ App. 8/25/2022) [read post]
10 Oct 2022, 2:48 am
Two days later, Judge Gibson dismissed proceedings in Zimmerman v Perkiss (No.2) [2022] NSWDC 458. [read post]
