Search for: "May v. County of Monterey" Results 1 - 20 of 93
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
California Supreme Court Holds that Employees Must Be Paid for Time Driving Through and To Security Checkpoints
2 Apr 2024, 6:02 am by Shareef Farag, Matthew W. Morris
In Huerta v. [read post]
Employment Law Spotlight - http://www.employmentlawspotlight.com/
New Bill Takes Up Local Oil Drilling Phase-Outs
25 Mar 2024, 7:57 am by Gabriel Greif
County of Monterey (“Chevron v. [read post]
Legal Planet - https://legal-planet.org/
2023 Year in Review: Transitions
23 Dec 2023, 5:00 pm by Tom Kosakowski
(This list may be updated upon receipt of additional information.) [read post]
The Ombuds Blog - http://ombuds-blog.blogspot.com/
Sixth District Reverses Writ, Upholds Responsible Agency Monterey County’s Approval of Desalination Plant In Reliance on CPUC’s EIR For Multi-Component, Cross-Jurisdictional Water Supply Project; Court Rejects CEQA Challenges Based On County’s Decision Not to Prepare Subsequent EIR and Allegedly Inadequate Statement of Overriding Considerations
7 Nov 2023, 8:37 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Marina Coast Water District v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
The California Supreme Court Held Monterey County’s Prohibition of the Injection of Oil and Gas Wastewater into a Well for Underground Storage or Disposal is Preempted by Public Resources Code section 3106.  (Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. County of Monterey (2023) S271869.)
5 Sep 2023, 2:00 am by Patrick L. Enright, Kara Anderson and Abbott & Kindermann, Inc.
Monterey County’s Measure Z In 2016, Protect Monterey County (“PMC”) sponsored, and Monterey County (“County”) votes passed Measure Z. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
California Supreme Court Rules County Ordinance Limiting Oil & Gas Development Preempted by State Law
6 Aug 2023, 11:42 pm by Richard Frank
County of Monterey. [read post]
Legal Planet - https://legal-planet.org/
Two Navy servicemen arrested for transmitting military information to the People’s Republic of China after receiving bribes
3 Aug 2023, 12:56 pm by jeffreynewmanadmin
United States v. [read post]
Whistleblower Blog - https://www.jeffreynewmanlaw.com/blog/
Civil Liberties Groups Demand California Police Stop Sharing Drivers’ Location Data With Police In Anti-Abortion States
25 May 2023, 9:30 am by Josh Richman
Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which overturned Roe v. [read post]
Deeplinks Blog - https://www.eff.org/deeplinks
Environmental Law Again Front-and-Center at California Supreme Court
19 May 2023, 9:11 am by Richard Frank
In 2016 Monterey County voters passed Measure Z, a citizen initiative intended to bar the drilling of new oil and gas wells in the county and ban the use of fracking technology for existing wells in Monterey County. [read post]
Legal Planet - https://legal-planet.org/
Local Authority Over Oil Drilling Heads to California Supreme Court
19 May 2023, 7:45 am by Gabriel Greif
Oral arguments in this case (Chevron v. [read post]
Legal Planet - https://legal-planet.org/
2022 CEQA 2nd QUARTER REVIEW
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am by Abbott & Kindermann, William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
” Tiburon Open Space Committee v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Sixth District Upholds Constitutionality of Judicial Council’s Covid Emergency Rules Altering CEQA’s Statutes of Limitations In Unpublished Opinion
20 May 2022, 1:24 pm by Matthew C. Henderson and Arthur F. Coon
Background The case involves the redevelopment of a part of the former Fort Ord in the City of Seaside in Monterey County. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2021 CEQA 4th QUARTER REVIEW
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Abbott & Kindermann, William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
Sixth District Holds Coastal Commission’s Post-Approval Analysis of Coastal Development Permit’s Environmental Impacts Violates CEQA
17 Dec 2021, 11:52 am by Arthur F. Coon
The Project and the Commission’s Actions and Findings on the CDP Real Party Heritage obtained a CDP from Monterey County for a mixed-use subdivision project and the County prepared an EIR analyzing impacts and alternatives. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2021 CEQA 3rd QUARTER REVIEW
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am by Abbott & Kindermann, William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
2021 CEQA 3rd QUARTER REVIEW
13 Oct 2021, 5:44 am by Abbott & Kindermann, William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
June Environmental Action News
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am by Abbott & Kindermann, William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
June Environmental Action News
1 Jul 2021, 3:00 am by Abbott & Kindermann, William W. Abbott, Diane G. Kindermann, Glen C. Hansen and Daniel S. Cucchi
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
Abbott & Kindermann Land Use Law Blog - http://blog.aklandlaw.com/
First District Affirms Judgment Rejecting CEQA and General Plan Consistency Challenges to Napa County’s EIR for Syar Quarry Expansion Project, Addresses Significant Exhaustion and Land Use Issues
3 May 2021, 9:58 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Stop Syar Expansion v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Relist Watch
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
Cook County, Illinois, 20-450, involve the Trump administration’s “public charge rule. [read post]
SCOTUSblog - http://www.scotusblog.com/