Search for: "May v. Dept. of Human Resources"
Results 1 - 20
of 132
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2024, 6:00 am
On August 10, 2023, a human resources employee emailed petitioner and stated: “[a]fter review of the medical documentation by the DOE doctor, restoration of health leave has been advised. [read post]
20 May 2024, 6:00 am
On August 10, 2023, a human resources employee emailed petitioner and stated: “[a]fter review of the medical documentation by the DOE doctor, restoration of health leave has been advised. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
IntegrateNYC, Inc. v State of New York2024 NY Slip Op 02369Decided on May 02, 2024Appellate Division, First DepartmentMoulton, J.Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.Decided and Entered: May 02, 2024 SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION First Judicial DepartmentSallie Manzanet-DanielsPeter H. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:30 am
Dept. of Health & Human Services 23 serve as tactical guideposts. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 11:20 am
[v] There is a specific formula for calculating available income. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 5:50 am
From Pinnacle Bancorp, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 11:45 am
Dept. of Water Resources (2023) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
In March 2000, the respondent Lisa Whitaker (hereinafter the complainant) was hired by the Town of Hempstead Department of Occupational Resources (hereinafter DOOR) as a life skills counselor. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 5:00 am
In March 2000, the respondent Lisa Whitaker (hereinafter the complainant) was hired by the Town of Hempstead Department of Occupational Resources (hereinafter DOOR) as a life skills counselor. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 3:28 pm
(Citing Citizens for a Green San Mateo v. [read post]
6 Jan 2023, 6:02 am
Virginia Dept. of Health and Human Resources, 532 U.S. 598, 600 (2001) even if the plaintiff’s lawsuit results in the desired change the court cannot award attorneys’ fees if there is no final judgment in the plaintiff’s favor. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:30 am
§1983, was construed by SCOTUS in Will v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
That tribunal had been the subject of widespread and high-level criticism in relation to its fairness and independence, including from the US Dept of State and the Bar Human Rights Committee. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 7:36 am
North Carolina Dept. of Human Resources, 347 N.C. 247 (1997), where a majority of the court held that the state could choose to pay for the childbirth expenses of indigent women but not for medically necessary abortions for the same population. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
” In that case, the police or unarmed social services worker may show, eventually. [read post]
25 Jan 2022, 9:00 pm
And I urge you not to miss the paragraph they ended with: In Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 2:45 pm
In Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. [read post]
