Search for: "May v. Exxon Corporation" Results 1 - 20 of 185
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2024, 6:45 am by Rebecca Tushnet
May 8, 2024) Being a multitrillion-dollar corporation means you can survive a “ridiculous” argument or two. [read post]
14 Sep 2023, 6:00 am by Tad Lipsky
Simultaneous with the executive order, however, the White House released an extensive report written from the President’s Council of Economic Advisers (CEA) asserting that it had found the same glitches in U.S. economic performance as The Economist—an alleged increase in both industrial concentration and corporate profits, with reduced U.S. innovation. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
Conagra can label its cooking oil "100% Natural," but may need to include different disclaimers in different states, to the extent that the label is seen as potentially misleading. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:05 pm by Oliver Hart and Luigi Zingales
One concern with SWM is that the controversies corporations are pushed into may explode. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 12:28 am by Bill Henderson
  Yet, you may be surprised that such opulence was not limited to robber barons or captains of industry. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The letter specifically cited a video recorded last summer by an undercover Greenpeace activist, in which Exxon lobbyist Keith McCoy tells the videographer the company “[fought] against some of the science” and used “shadow groups” to obfuscate the link. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Exxon claims that in filing lawsuits against the company over its role in the climate crisis, the officials are orchestrating a conspiracy against the firm’s first amendment rights. [read post]
Exxon Mobil Corporation, 2009-2368 (La. 10/19/10), 48 So. 3d 234, to find that Lexington Land’s claims were prescribed. [read post]
Exxon Mobil Corporation, 2009-2368 (La. 10/19/10), 48 So. 3d 234, to find that Lexington Land’s claims were prescribed. [read post]
Exxon Mobil Corporation, 2009-2368 (La. 10/19/10), 48 So. 3d 234, to find that Lexington Land’s claims were prescribed. [read post]
Exxon Mobil Corporation, 2009-2368 (La. 10/19/10), 48 So. 3d 234, to find that Lexington Land’s claims were prescribed. [read post]