Search for: "McFarlane v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 94
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2015, 3:40 pm by Daily Record Staff
By indictment filed in the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County, Maryland, the State charged appellant, Jermain Jamal Williams, with robbery with a deadly weapon of Norman McFarlane, robbery with a deadly weapon of Meghan Walker, first-degree assault of Shamariah Yehudah, first-degree assault of Damion Dixon, attempted second-degree murder of Officer Pierre Boone, and related charges. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 4:54 am by Adam Wagner
Read more: More posts on religious discrimination Judgment in Mcfarlane v Relate Avon Ltd. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 4:41 am
McFarlane, which was decided on December 13, 2007. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 5:32 pm by INFORRM
On 4 March 2019, the decision in Venables & Anor v News Group Papers Ltd & Ors ([2019] EWHC 494 (Fam)) was handed down. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:00 pm by Sinead Ring
Comment McFarlane is the latest in a stream of decisions of the ECtHR holding Ireland in breach of Article 6 due to delays: McMullen v Ireland; Doran v Ireland; O’Reilly and Others v Ireland, and Barry v Ireland. [read post]
9 May 2010, 9:50 pm by Rosalind English
McFarlane v Relate Avon Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ B1 (29 April 2010) – Read judgment or our previous post Case comment Lord Carey of Clifton, responding to Lord Justice Laws’ observations in MacFarlane, has called this latest dust-up about religion in the courts a “deeply unedifying clash of rights“. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 7:41 pm by James S. Friedman, LLC
  In my mind, this was as astonishing example of thoughtless, cookie-cutter justice at its worst.I recalled this incredibly unpleasant experience as I read the recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision of State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The Court of Appeal decision in Google Inc v Vidal-Hall [2015] EWCA Civ 311(27 March 2015) (Dyson MR and Sharp LJ in a joint judgment; McFarlane LJ concurring), affirming the judgment of Tugendhat J (at[2014] EWHC 13 (QB) (16 January 2014)), is a very important decision on damages for invasion of privacy, and it raises significant questions about the correctness of Feeney J’s reasoning in the earlier Irish case of Collins v FBD Insurance plc [2013] IEHC 137 (14 March… [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am by INFORRM
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 2:16 pm by Amy Howe
In a sketch depicting last week’s oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 8:29 am
The inquiry is always in two stages, namely computation and distribution;”iv) The House of Lords in White v White [2001] AC 596 and Miller v Miller and McFarlane v McFarlane [2006] 2 AC 618 has given guidance as to the approach and principles to be applied in the exercise of the statutory discretion conferred by the MCA 1973.v) That guidance makes it clear that the court is to have regard to, and apply, the relevant statutory provisions.vi)… [read post]
27 Nov 2016, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
The case of Lachaux v Independent Print, most important libel appeal of 2016 will be heard by the Court of Appeal (McFarlane, Davis and Sharp LJJ) on 29 and 30 November 2016. [read post]