Search for: "McGUIRE v. McGUIRE" Results 1 - 20 of 536
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jun 2024, 2:53 pm by Thorsten Bausch (Hoffmann Eitle)
Mary-Rose McGuire and her team of students at the University of Osnabrück presented interesting insights into very practical developments in industry (sustainable packaging materials made of corrugated cardboard to replace plastic packs) as well as lectures about the compatibility of sustainability agreements with EU anti-competition law and about key technologies and accession rights. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
We have so far left open the possibility that injuries caused by the intentional acts of a third party might in some cases satisfy the requirements for ADR, and continue to do so today (see Matter of Walsh v Scoppetta, 18 NY3d 850, 852 [2011]; see also McCambridge v McGuire, 62 NY2d 563, 567 [1984] [the focus of the inquiry is on "the precipitating cause of injury"]; Arthur A. [read post]
24 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
We have so far left open the possibility that injuries caused by the intentional acts of a third party might in some cases satisfy the requirements for ADR, and continue to do so today (see Matter of Walsh v Scoppetta, 18 NY3d 850, 852 [2011]; see also McCambridge v McGuire, 62 NY2d 563, 567 [1984] [the focus of the inquiry is on "the precipitating cause of injury"]; Arthur A. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"* In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in… [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"* In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in… [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in violation… [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In York v McGuire, 63 NY2d 760, the Court of Appeals set out the basic rule concerning the dismissal of probationary employees as follows: “After completing his or her minimum period of probation and prior to completing his or her maximum period of probation, a probationary employee can be dismissed without a hearing and without a statement of reasons, as long as there is no proof that the dismissal was done for a constitutionally impermissible purpose, or in violation… [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, "Due process requires that the * * * hearing be open to the press and public" [See Fitzgerald v. [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Further, "Due process requires that the * * * hearing be open to the press and public" [See Fitzgerald v. [read post]