Search for: "McNamee v. Clemens" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2012, 4:35 pm by Michael McCann
I have a new column for SI.com on McNamee's testimony and what it could signal about each side's strategy going forward - as the case is in its 6th week. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:30 pm by Howard Wasserman
In Clemens, Clemens sued McNamee in Texas over statements McNamee made to the Mitchell Commission and Sports Illustrated in New York about conduct occurring in New York and Toronto. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 9:55 am by Lee Davis
  Government’s Exhibit List USA v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 7:24 am by Kiran Bhat
McNamee, a case arising out of a defamation claim brought by famed baseball pitcher Roger Clemens against his former personal trainer. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:30 am by John Elwood
Shepard, 10-925 (held since 5/19/11 for CSX) Clemens v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 12:39 pm by John Elwood
McNamee, 10-966, a petition arising out of a defamation lawsuit brought by Roger Clemens against his former trainer. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 1:28 am by Lon Sobel
The current issue of Loeb & Loeb's IP/Entertainment Law Weekly Update reports on and links to a recent decision in McNamee v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 2:20 pm by Sheldon Toplitt
District Court for the Eastern District of New York, where Brian McNamee's libel suit against the former Cy Young award-winner was pared down, but allowed to proceed, according to a story in today's New York Post.In McNamee v. [read post]
4 Sep 2010, 4:05 am by INFORRM
In Clemens v McNamee a former Major League Baseball pitcher failed to revive a defamation suit against his former trainer Brian McNamee, who alleged he injected had injected the plaintiff with performance-enhancing drugs. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 6:02 am by Howard Wasserman
Second, the panel divided over the proper understanding of the "effects test" of Calder v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 7:30 pm by Howard Wasserman
The visits to Texas were part of the overall relationship that put McNamee in position to give Clemens steroids, to be a source on steroid use for the Mitchell Commission and Sports Illustrated, and to make the defamatory statements.Second, the panel divided over the proper understanding of the "effects test" of Calder v. [read post]