Search for: "Means v. City of Dayton" Results 1 - 20 of 40
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Nov 2022, 2:12 am by INFORRM
Art, Music and Copyright Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham has called the City Council’s decision not to lift the Noise Abatement Notice issued to the Night and Day Café music venue an “embarrassment. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 12:10 pm by Lawrence Solum
To reach this conclusion, this Essay starts by building off of Justice Pat DeWine’s dissent in Dayton v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am by Eugene Volokh
But if the court really wants to keep the plaintiff's identity secret, then the witness would have to be put under some sort of protective order to remain quiet about that identity as well.[8] Many people are likely to resist becoming witnesses if that means agreeing to a protective order, at least if they have no personal stake in the matter. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 12:54 pm by John Elwood
New York City and Lucas v. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
  Technology, Social Media, and Professional Ethics, 45 University of Dayton Law Review 63 (2020). 287 Media Appearances Quoted in Impeachment Trial, Divisive Cases Hang Over Chief Justice, Law360 (Jan. 1, 2020). [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am by Chris Wesner
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT DAYTON TAGNETICS, INC., Appellant, v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am by Derek T. Muller
-Main 2.00 $96,321 $48,200 Univ. of Missouri-Kansas City 2.02 $99,005 $49,000 Indiana Univ. [read post]
8 May 2019, 8:49 am
While, at first glance, H.B. 694 appeared to provide some practicality and legal cost savings by allowing a number of non-attorney agents to file real estate tax complaints, the Supreme Court of Ohio in Dayton Supply & Tool Co., Inc. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2019, 9:01 pm
While, at first glance, H.B. 694 appeared to provide some practicality and legal cost savings by allowing a number of non-attorney agents to file real estate tax complaints, the Supreme Court of Ohio in Dayton Supply & Tool Co., Inc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2017, 6:41 am by Dan Carvajal
Ohio’s tangible personal property tax, levied by local taxing authorities alongside real property taxes, raised a combined $1.7 billion in local revenues in fiscal year 2005, much of which flowed to school districts ($1.2 billion), though counties ($319 million), cities and villages ($92 million), and townships ($67 million) also leaned on the tax as a source of revenue.[13] Tangible personal property taxes are “taxpayer active,” meaning that taxpayers bear the… [read post]