Search for: "Mendez v. Mendez" Results 1 - 20 of 397
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2023, 11:00 pm
.# # #DECISIONMuchnik v Mendez Trucking, Inc. [read post]
23 May 2023, 11:00 pm
.# # #DECISIONMuchnik v Mendez Trucking, Inc. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 10:39 am by Sanford Hausler
  To protect the student's rights, the IDEA contains a stay-put provision that provides that “during the pendency of any proceedings,” the child is entitled to “remain in [her] then-current educational placement” at public expense.In Mendez v. [read post]
20 Apr 2023, 10:39 am
  To protect the student's rights, the IDEA contains a stay-put provision that provides that “during the pendency of any proceedings,” the child is entitled to “remain in [her] then-current educational placement” at public expense.In Mendez v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 1:34 pm
All this money and attorney's fees wasted by the state on something that accomplishes essentially -- probably, literally -- nothing.I can't believe we don't have better things to do with our time.Anyway, the case gets remanded back to Judge Mendez. [read post]
22 Dec 2022, 9:07 pm by Elizabeth Penava
Supreme Court in West Virginia v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Significantly, the Appellate Division noted the Plaintiff's claim that her initial filing tolled the statute of limitations was unavailing "because the time to commence an Article 78 proceeding is not extended by her eventual pursuit of administrative remedies," citing Matter of Mendez v New York City Dept. of Educ., 128 AD3d 584. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 5:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Significantly, the Appellate Division noted the Plaintiff's claim that her initial filing tolled the statute of limitations was unavailing "because the time to commence an Article 78 proceeding is not extended by her eventual pursuit of administrative remedies," citing Matter of Mendez v New York City Dept. of Educ., 128 AD3d 584. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 5:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (Grant v Mendez, 2013 NY Slip Op 33750[U], *3 [Sup Ct, Westchester County 2013]). [read post]